Should vertical elbows be legal?

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by achillesthegreat, Dec 8, 2009.


  1. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004
    Yes. But I agree about not allowing stamps etc. But elbows in Muay Thai do not often end careers. You are allowed to spike people or suplex them in a far more dangerous move than an elbow.

    Look at when Randleman supplexed Fedor, that could easily have broken his neck and paralysed him.

    I would ban that sort of move before banning elbows.
     
  2. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Yeah if you throw the perfect horizontal elbow, but every elbow thrown in the 12 to 6 motion has potential to do serious damage.
     
  3. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    According to the rules, you aren't allowed to land someone on their neck.
     
  4. The Priest

    The Priest New Member Full Member

    46
    0
    Dec 2, 2009
    :!:yes defo a good way to finish fight
     
  5. dublynflya

    dublynflya Stand your ground Son!! Full Member

    5,727
    7
    Oct 30, 2009
    :good In my humble opinion, the problem with the vertical elbow, when thrown at an opponents head is that it will almost always land on the top of an opponents head, and could easily hit the back of the head, as opposed to the horizontal elbow, which will almost always hit an opponent in the face or front of the head. The fact is that the rule is in place for a reason, and I for one am interested to learn exactly what that is. It is of course, for reasons of safety, but who exactly advised this rule and why? Are ALL vertical elbows, to ANY area of the body illegal? I am unsure of this (I am sure I have seen vertical elbows to thighs, but it may well have been an "Old" UFC that I was watching:)), so please advise. To be honest I am not too disappointed that they are illegal, todays world class mma fighters have sufficient weapons in their arsenal to do serious damage without them and any blow that increases the risk of a serious blow to the top (And especially back) of the head can remain illegal for me. I'm sure plenty feel differently, but hey this site would be crap if we all agreed:).
     
  6. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    12-6 from top guard seems the only thing illegal.
     
  7. Koa

    Koa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,380
    3
    Sep 24, 2004
    Well you just help my point.. These strikes are supposed to be about potential damage.

    If anything, the 12-6 motion is going to cut someone up, very badly and very quickly, but this is part of the MMA game that the UFC decided to include in their GnP, as elbow strikes from any position tend to cause a lot of cuts.

    I could care less if elbows are allowed or not. If they are allowed, then they should be allowed.
     
  8. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Allow the elbow. If the guy gets cut open, stop the fight and he loses. Guys will then start being more wary of staying on their back forever or not moving their head, popping their hips etc