Sky PPV vs. 1 month Boxnation Subscription – Which is better value for money?

not really, unless you're stupid enough to think you're better off spending 3x as much for 1/30 of the product or you're heavily weighing your argument.

 

sky sports is only £12 a month? is this accurate?

 

you seriously reckon rupert's a better option? you shouldn't've bought your moral compass from solaris, reality is more nuanced than good / frank.

 

Bt sport is

 

No it isn't - if they charge £30 for one night then they deserve to be called out as hypocrites

 

If you have sky (which is where the majority of BN subscribers watch it through) then Rupert gets your money, then again just about every big company has a ton of skeletons in their closet

 

if people choose to pay over the odds for a product, that's on them.

 

true indeed, which is why i find it odd people single out boxnation because frank is affiliated.

 

Probably because boxnation is very closely affiliated with franks promotional companies whereas matchroom/sky boxing don't have that close a link?

 

All those fights on Boxnation that no ****er will be watching, sad. I'll be watching the ****ing lot for absolute zip too.

Fook em.

 

By oxymoron.. the individual makes more money in a box office etc.

The 100K subs a month or whatever it is.


Ain't the same as Floyd Mayweather selling 1,000,000.

 

So SBO is better (for the fighter)

 

Money comes from the sale of the mars bar.

(Slow motion of fat barstard buying a mars bar)

 

It would cost me £20 to subscribe to boxnation, not £12 and you have conveniently left out all the boxing fights that have been on sky sports.

You definitely work for FW

 

only someone with the boxing knowledge of a womble would choose sky ppv over that