Smith and Watt - realistic replacements

i dont have any but i get it from the way he always talks about boxing broardcasters

im sure theyd have him but he charges to much

 

Need someone who won't be totally controlled by Sky. I'd say they need to actually have their own opinion too but then you get Jim Watt and his opinion, then we don't like it (I know I don't).

 

Again you accuse him of something you can't prove.

 

Thats a pretty weak argument to say the least mate.

 

again?

and i use my comme sence ad realise that he hasnt worked ona tv station since setanta went down and hes not that bad a broardcaster

 

i just make the ssumtion that since he isnt working for a tv company combined with actully being an alrite pundit

2+2 makes 4 but if our bunce youd want 5

 

Bunce only costs 2 Pork Pies :huh

 

Who is out there for him? Sky? He is too controversial for them, and I am pretty sure him and McCrory don't see eye to eye.

What is the other broadcaster that shows boxing now? Primetime? He did the punditry for the Froch vs Dirrell fight.

 

What's Enzo Calzaghe been doing since retiring?:think

 

The Sky team do seem a bit too cosy.They need someone like Hart and/or Eubank to shake things up.

What about McGuigan as a commentator?Not great,but better than Adam Smith for sure

 

If Enzo Calzaghe starts commentating for Sky then I shall stop watching British fights unless it's at the venue

 

Herol Graham?

Or Sky could poach the RTE team-McAuley and that other geezer?

 

Matt Hatton and Clare Balding.

 

classic misconception about bunce and sky hes not to contrverial just too expensive

his show with william hill has been cut down

long and short of it is he should have a ob but dosent