Something Special About Adamek...

adamek is a good fighter who could turn into something really special. he is one tough kid who seems to get better each fight. I think he kos haye, and could beat HWs like kevin johnson, chambers and chageav. But, I'd first like to see him pound the crap outta ruiz.

 

:amen

 

No, it's the mentality that a Polish person can't be capable of being muscular or a great fighter unless he uses steroids. Same **** I used to read about Golota back in the day... oh, he juiced. ****ing ridiculous. :tired

 

Your buddy shags your "clean as a whistle" *******.

 

Disagree, Golota underestimated Adamek and came in at a career high of 256 pounds thinking he can just crush him with his mass. Frankly, if Golota can lose 15-20 pounds I think he can still bang with top ten contenders. I wouldn't be surprised if Adamek gave either Klitschko hell.

 

:verysad You're delusional. Golota is done. How many times does he need to get his ass kicked before you realise this? And I don't like Adamek's chances against either Kilt. He has zero shot to outbox either. Wlad would almost definately knock him out as Adamek tried to bully his way in. Vitali would probably beat him into submission.

 

Unless one of them were to suffer in injury during the fight, they would definately beat Adamek. Adamek can't outbox either and he doesn't have the size. power, or speed needed to get inside and punish them. Both of those guys are bigger, stronger, hit harder, and are more skilled than Adamek. It would be a nice payday for Adamek, but he would take a beating from either guy.

 

You simply don't know what the hell you're talking about. Anyone who saw that fight is knows what they're talking about, saw Adamek get outboxed in that fight. Even if you didn't see the fight, the scorecards would tell you all you need to know. Anytime you score 3 knockdowns, you should win by a wide margin. The only time that doesn't happen is when you get outboxed in the majority of the rounds. See Pac vs. Marquez I and Wlad vs. Peter to see what I'm talking about.

 

You're not even giving any reasons for why Adamek would win. You're just spouting a bunch of cliches and making general statements with no thought or analysis behind it.

 

He can win a title at HW, just not against the Klitschkos

 

Even a blind man could see Adamek getting whooped up in that fight. Just because I'm from Philly doesn't mean I can't honestly assess a fight involving a Philly fighter. Are you polish?

 

I have no problem with Adamek not giving Cunningham a rematch. I understand him not wanting to rematch a guy who outboxed him like that. However, it's pretty ridiculous for Adamek fans to claim Hopkins is ducking Adamek when there isn't a lot of interest in that fight and when he has bigger fight sitting there with Jones.

 

Now you're just being completely ridiculous. No one knocks out Hopkins. Cunningham was leaving himself wide open and Adamek couldn't finish him off. There is absolutely no way in hell that Adamek would ever stop Hopkins. Hopkins is too crafty, too smart, too good defensively, and has too good of a chin. You completely overrate Adamek.

 

I sincerely hope that you are right.

 

What the hell are you talking about? I have no problem with Adamek. I'm just not going to pick him over the Klits, and I sure as hell wouldn't pick him to KO Hopkins. That's just stupid.

:rofl Please tell me this is a joke. I'm sorry but you don't know anything about the sport if that's your honest opinion. That may be one of the silliest things I've read on this forum.