sorry calzaghe your resume is weakest ever.

Once again, I'll ask you to compare Hopkins's resume.

 

I don't think his resume is all that weak ...

If anything he's the product of a weak division but thats no different from Hopkins.

Hopkins dominated a weak division as well and the names on his resume (as far as victories) aren't that different from Calzaghe's.

He has 4 big name victories on his resume (Tito, Oscar, Tarver, and Wright)
Calzaghe has (Eubanks, Kessler, Hopkins, and Mitchell)

 

Probably because Calzaghe's only 36.

 

maximummsg... i agree with you in this case....

lacy was a burger the whole time....

bhop was over the hill ...

i dont konw about kessler though

 

Kessler is better than anyone Hopkins has ever beaten.

 

No I was comparing and they aren't that different ... there might not be a DLH or a Tito on his resume but there are some solid guys on his resume and he did just beat Hopkins.

I'm not the biggest Calzaghe fan but I do know that what he's done grants some respect.

Its very hard to do what he's done and not get upset ...

 

nah man.

kessler>odlh?

aint no way

 

So you think Oscar would beat Kessler in a fight at MW or SMW? What exactly did Oscar achieve at MW other than to get a boxing lesson from Felix Sturm to make you think that?

 

Niether Oscar nor Tito did anything significant at MW ... the majority of the guys that Calzaghe beat accomplished something at that level ... I can admit that alot of them were fillers but so were most of the guys on Hopkins level.

And Calzaghe has more defenses ... and he became the undisputed champion last year.