Spence is an exceptional offensive fighter.

I see that fight being close the difference will be the fight and dog Crawford has in him that Thurman doesn't especially in the championship rounds where I see this being the case.

 

He did fight a complete bum though, but i do like spence. think he will smash crawford into another dimension.

 

he is a beast, its too easy for him. the man is in the zone and far above anyone else at his weight.

 

What Spence has is a very good chin and poise under pressure. He can maintain in the heat of battle and deliver. I don't think that Crawford is ready for that. Thurman is a little smarter than Crawford because he has already peeped that and that is why he's sidestepping the confrontation for now. I think that Spence beats Crawford at this point and any of the other three, Danny, Porter and Thurman would present a formidable challenge and could quite possibly beat him as well. I don't see a cakewalk in any of those fights.

 

He is an offensive machine. Fast, hard straight shots, switches them up to head and a body and counters very well too. But Brook showed he isn't prefect, he can be backed up and made less effective.

He needs to fight Thurman or Crawford or even better both of them. I don't think either of them is a big favourite over the other which what makes welter the hottest division right now for me.

Can Crawford use enough movement, pot shotting and counters to befuddle Spence who does have that wide stance that can make him less mobile. A good mover could prove troublesome. Or does Spence expose Crawford at this level and break him down.

Can Thurman's speed and power force Spence back like Brook did. Can Spence handle the power or does his straighter shots down the middle see him beat Thurman to the punch and he force Thurman onto the retreat.

 

I don't find Spence offensive at all.

 

Time to stop fighting bums, he went life and death with Kell Brook, needs to step up in opposition
He's got some mean bodywork though

 

Life and death?????? No. Lost 3 or 4 rounds in the first half and then took over.

 

I concur.

 

And they are very wonderful tools.

 

Crawford, as a hybrid out-fighter, is all wrong for Spence.

It wouldn't be easy for Crawford, but I suspect he'd win a comfortable decision.

 

Brook outboxed him before his eye got injured from an accidental headbutt.

 

How do we know anything about Spence? He fought Ocampo who had never fought a top 20 fighter, had zero power, was there to make Spence look good. It's easy to look good against a fighter who has zero boxing ability and zero power. He beat a damaged Brook in his first fight after being beaten up badly by Golovkin....................let Spence fight Golovkin, then right after that fight he can fight Brook in a rematch at 154.....................Brooks will do much better if he has anything left............

 

Actually, it is Spence whose resume is clearly lacking behind Crawford and Thurman's achievements.

I would pick Spence to beat both of them right now. But based on accomplishment, he is behind them.