And what does Bunce who has lied substantially for british fighters in the past and one of the worst homers ive ever heard spout crap on TV and in the press made you and expert on Haye Wlad negotiations? I think that makes you even less likely to know the truth if he is you "source" from his past recored. For that matter is that really something to be proud of he is an example of everything that is wrong with boxing journalism in the UK he is like Teddy atlas on steroids even more biased and ridiculous in the things he says and claims. listing him as your main credential makes me less likely to believe anything you say as fact:deal Again why did you make claims in the past that Haye KO'd Both Sultan and Arreola in sparring we later found out that he never even met Arreola, And again if you are privy to the negotiations what are the terms of the contract offered, You claim its not 50/50 yet that has been brought up by multiple people some who claim to have inside knowledge yet have offered no evidence nor what you claim are the stipulations and the percentage split in the contract... If you are an insider in it what is the split offered.
But you can tell us what the contract wasn't. In that case can you tell me that it wasn't 60/40, 55/45, 65/35, 70/30? You have no problem disclosing that it wasn't 50/50, so you should be able to tell us what deals I put forward it wasn't also. We can read between the lines.
Hmm fair enough i had it in my head that you brought it up here first which was abviously not the case :thumbsup
Haha, jut finished reading the back and forth and you and Rushman got owned. Are you still sure Wlad offered Haye 50/50/ And for everyone complaining about Haye being silent, chill out. Silence is good. It usually means negotiations are taking place and no one is trying to mess it up by leaking things ala (Pac v Mayweather The blueprint on how not to handle negotiations)