They never addressed the question of why did he use an IV ? According to their own anti-doping guidelines they are not allowed unless in the case of an emergency medical procedure. Dehydration should be treated by drinking, according to the guidelines. It just doesn't add up, does it?
What is this whole story? Why you making it out to be more than it is. The man used an IV, he should be banned. If you fail to understand that USADA was just a contractor then who knows why you ask these stupid questions regarding their motivation. They stood to lose nothing, not their WADA accreditation not their business, nor much of anything else especially after NSAC did a 180 degree turn on their initial statement damning USADA. What do they lose then? What story are we not getting? Was it convenient that NSAC did a 180? I don't understand this BS reasoning with you. In the back of your mind you know this is BS, a fraud, but you won't admit it. What you need more evidence of how corrupt USADA is? Everyone knows they be corrupt lmao, so is WADA. Hi Fancy Bears.