Stop saying that Carl "So easy a caveman could do it" Froch beat Andre Dirrell

scum

another scum

 

Froch beat Dirrell

 

:thumbsup

 

Indeed. And Carl Froch won against Andre Dirrell.

Its pretty common knowledge that Froch isn't the most fluid of fighters but Dirrell didn't do enough to beat him.

Dirrell lost because he fought a very negative fight but, as you say "There is nothing in judging that says you award a round to another guy because you dont like the other guys style".

Maybe you should apply that statement when reviewing your own opinion?

 

I had it 114-113 froch...

 

Does Dirrell have an L on his record next to the name Carl Froch?

 

Froch beat Dirrell

 

so did I

 

Froch beat the pansy, but to Dirrell's eternal credit he was never floored.

You should be happy MW, Nov27, Froch is gonna avenge the "neurological damage" your ****buddy suffered -- think of it that way?

 

I've only watched this fight once and I had Dirrell winning like 7 rounds to 5, although it certainly may have been biased at the time, as I wanted Dirrell to win.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY[/ame]

This tells more of what happend.

 

It doesn't really matter, you can spin it any which way you want, but unless you and Dirrell are completely naive to how boxing is you know that away from home in a fighters backyard, wherever that may be, you absolutely have to come up with a convincing display to win the fight. He didn't do it.

 

Froch won

Get over it