Stop saying that Carl "So easy a caveman could do it" Froch beat Andre Dirrell

No. Because his holding wasnt excessive. If the referee had been doing his job Froch would have been disqualified. Holding is and has always been part of boxing, and Dirrell maybe held for 3 rounds.

However we have seen in England before a fighter be perminently injured because of rabbit punching. That is the disqualifiable offense.

 

Why are you still talking without posting your scorecard? I dont get it?

 

We've been over this. Even Rooney said virtually this was what Tyson was when he left him. Tyson still had something like 13 years left in his career. What dont you understand about this?


Oh and post your scorecard, stop bitching out like you always do.

 

I already have numerous times. We even had a poll which I won and you lost when you tried to make the same argument. Many commended Dirrell for his performance becuase he was a young inexperienced fighter, Haye was slaughtered with many thinking he actually lost to Valuev. Do I need to pull this back up?



Oh and stop changing the subject, stop being a ***** like Haye when he sees a photo of Vitali and post your scorecard.

 

He only fell once. That was when he was throwing a punch. The other 3 times he was either pulled down or body slammed.

Watch the highlight vids. Dirrell landed a bunch of clean effective punches. And he did hurt Froch.

Dirrell maintained effective range for most of the fight. His running is overstated. Watch the 5th round. Thats the distance Dirrell maintained for most of the fight.

Froch was frustrated he couldnt hit Dirrell. Nothing to do with trying to make it a fight.

Being body slammed and hit in the back of the head repeatedly will cause a fighter to do that.

Although he should have realized he wasnt going to get any favors in England and at any moment Ricky Hatton could have come out if the stands with a bat and hit him with it, this is England and in boxing there there is no rules and he should have been told to fight like his back was against the wall.

 

I've named several before. Wlad vs Ibragimov, Ruiz vs Johnson, Vitali vs Johnson, Hopkins vs Calzaghe, Hatton vs Urango ect ect. Owned again.

Now stop being a ***** and post your scorecard. :rofl

 

The referee didnt know what he was doing. One of the worst performances by a referee in boxing. By a good referees standards, Froch is disqualified and Dirrell doesnt have a point taken away. As even Al Berstein who is absolutely impartial stated when the point was taken.