Stop saying that Carl "So easy a caveman could do it" Froch beat Andre Dirrell

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MichiganWarrior, Oct 16, 2010.


  1. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    It was not even a close fight, infact the only thing that could be considered close, were how narrowly Dirrell was winning the rounds he won, although he was! winning them, simply because he! was the man actually landing punches.

    Oh, and the only other thing which could conceivably deem it a close fight, is the fact that Dirrell had a point taken.

    Hell, even in the rounds I gave Froch he only won them cause he broke Dirrell's rhythm by rabbit punching him in the back of the head in the clinches, infact the rounds I gave Froch I put (kind) next to as he was losing the fight so comprehensively, it seemed unfair not to reward him occasionally, simply based on the fact he seemed certain to lose cause of how many rounds Dirrell had already taken off him.


    The Kessler fight was close, the Dirrell fight wasn't.
     
  2. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    :patsch
    Lol. Ill draw a line under it here. It seems if I say "A" you're just going to say "B". Whatever I say is right, you say is wrong.

    You're obviously too arrogant to hold an intelligent conversation with so i'll leave you to spew your current brand of **** out at the others.

    You, my friend, are a ****.
     
  3. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    What do you mean "owned"? I said a contender winning a championship. You just named a bunch of a fights where the champion won. Owned yourself, perhaps.

    Wlad (2 titles) beat Ibragimov (1 title)
    Ruiz (Champion) beat Johnson (Challenger)
    Vitali (Champion) beat Johnson (Challenger)
    Calzaghe and Hopkins wasn't a title fight
    Hatton (The Ring Champion) beat Urango (Champion)

    Aside from that, none of those performances were as poor.

    Try again. Please read my posts. It has to be a poorer title winning effort, without injuries or disqualification.
     
  4. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Wlad was challenging for Ibragimovs title you clown. It was a unification bout. Wlad only held 1 recognized title btw. IBO isnt a championship.
    Hopkins was the Ring Champion. Calzaghe won the Ring title when he beat Hopkins dope. :patsch
    All of these performances were poor. Dirrell hit and hurt Froch plenty of times. Calzaghe didnt land maybe 3-4 clean punches on Hopkins.


    Hell Valuev winning the WBA from Ruiz.

    Again owned again *****. Now post your scorecard.
     
  5. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    :good
     
  6. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Oh I don't know, could be something to do with the fact I'm on an oil platform in the middle of the north sea 300 miles away from my house with no access to my boxing collection.

    Sure enough I'll post it when I get home, 2 weeks from now.:good
     
  7. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Wlad was recognized world champion. Ibragimov a title holder.

    Calzaghe was also The Ring champion, albeit at a light weight, but this fight was not seen as champion vs. challenger, but, rather, champion vs. champion.

    If you want to chose that, fine. Calzaghe's performance was much better than Dirrell's, so pick another.
    They were poor, but they weren't as poor.
    Valuev's performances was better.

    My scorecard was 120-107 to Carl 'The Cobra' Frooooooooooooch!!!!!!
     
  8. 1HitterQuitter

    1HitterQuitter RUTHLESS BY LAW Full Member

    1,558
    0
    Feb 27, 2010
    I believe Dirrell won also but he fought like a straight up biatch. If only he brought it like he did against arthur.