Valuev was genuinely useless though with no real skill or from what i remember (and i have tried to forget) game plan Sorry, although i understand some comparisons, it stops at speed and size
So you watched an 8 min highlight video....and you think you're able to make a point about who was winning on points in a fight who lasted more than 15 minutes? Interesting theory.
He was ahead after 5 rounds and got hurt badly. Plus he is known for fading in fights. I don´t see how he was winning.
Even Alen ''The Savage'' Babic aka the real life Kratos thinks it was a good stoppage This content is protected
Joyce was throwing shots at Takam and Takam was trying to dodge him, waiting for Joyce to be exhausted and waiting for the right moment to respond. BAD STOPPAGE DECISION.
Despite one stanky leg dance and another instance where his legs stiffened? Getting hit with around 20 punches is not a good plan without firing back In other words it didnt happen Takam was nigh on finished
I'm gobsmacked someone in the same thread says it was a bad stoppage and that Takam was winning without even watching the entire fight. Using that logic, it would be considered fine for judges to bring a tablet and watch a bit of YouTube while at ringside, just as long as they noted a few big punches per round: 'Yeah I'll give that round to Takam. Which round is it by the way?'
The opposite... the fact you are prepared to assess a fight without watching it all, suggests the issue with bias lies with you. Highlights are by definition biased towards certain parts of a contest....
Well, he watched the whole fight and although i don't agree with him at least he has a base to his argument Plus Del has talked bollocks for years and has again proved it here Losing every round indeed
