Talking points memo: Shane Mosley's darkside coming to light

BigReg · Jun 6, 2008

A few things. FIRST off, it hasn't been proven that Shane used illegal performance enhancing drugs for the Oscar fight. So if he didn't use them, he's not lying. And even if he did and he is, that's hardly a 'darkside'.

Click to expand...

You don't know what you're talking about sambob. It has been proven that Shane used illegal performance enhancers for the Oscar fight. Check this out;

Evidence seized during the BALCO raids, which was presented at the November conference, indicates that on July 26, 2003, results of blood work Mosley had done established that his hematocrit level -- a test measuring the volume of red blood cells -- was 44. On a calendar that accompanied Mosley's file, the date 7/26 was circled and accompanied by the word "start" and the letter "e," which investigators believe represents EPO. By Aug. 8, Mosley's hematocrit level had soared to 52.2. "Most men are in the low 40s," says anti-doping expert Dr. Gary Wadler. "Anything over 50 is considered off the charts." That level, Wadler says, is dangerously high but could benefit an athlete's stamina. According to the calendar, Mosley's last dose of EPO was administered on Sept. 8, five days before the fight

Click to expand...

Also, the cheating is not the problem here. The problem is the lying, slandering, and wasting of the court's time and money. Shane can't win this lawsuit, yet he proceeds with it in an attempt to dupe the public into believing his innocence.

Why does nobody think his accusers might be lying? Perhaps there was some kind of argument, and they are made at Shane. Its possible that maybe they think Shane will offer them money in exchange for them saying they were mistaken about him using steroids. There could be a lot of things.

Click to expand...

This assertion is far fetched. Now Conte is trying to blackmail Shane?Shane claims Conte duped him into taking steroids in 2003. Why the hell would he be having any sort of contact with Conte 5 years later? Furthermore, if that did happen, how Mosley or his lawyers have yet to make a statement about it? In fact, they haven't made statements about this latest lawsuit period.

bigeddie27 · Jun 6, 2008

BigReg said:

Number 2, I never compared alcohol to steroids.
Click to expand...

but you did, hence you just have diaherrea coming out of your mouth, hence you are made to look like a dumb ****. but please write another essay with you trying to backpeddle your way out of saying stuff that doesnt make snese, please.

pmfan · Jun 6, 2008

eze said:

I never said they did. But they do give the boxer the ability to practice longer and harder. So example. Jermain Taylor takes roids for stamina, he is able to practice longer throwing the jab and not lowering his right hand when he does. He can do it 2-3+ more hours in a day because the roids allow him to.

They give the boxer the chance to practice longer which in result if used properly can allow the boxer to practice a certain thing longer.

Steroids dont teach skill but they give the boxer the ability to practice longer to perfect the skill.

And to say Mosley didn't gain anything from steroids is a laughable statement.
Click to expand...

Shane was already a great boxer. But DLH was a championship calibre boxer as well. The extra stregth, speed and endurance could have been the difference in two closely contested fights.

Log in or Sign up

Talking points memo: Shane Mosley's darkside coming to light

BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

bigeddie27 Boxing Addict Full Member

pmfan Active Member Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

Talking points memo: Shane Mosley's darkside coming to light

BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

bigeddie27 Boxing Addict Full Member

pmfan Active Member Full Member