$$$$$ Taylor vs Pavlik - 1 month off ESB bet thread $$$$$

1) It is not that I think "Taylor is a fraud". I actually like Taylor.
2) I think Pavlik has the ability to beat him.
3) Pavlik is a likeable fighter.
4) I am from Y-town.

 

I hear ya. If you were from "Amsterdam-town" things would be a little different though, wouldn't they? If that were the case I think you'd pretty much be obligated to accept any bet with anyone regardless of the stakes. The bet could even be "The loser has to make a youtube video of themselves chopping their own nuts off and feeding them to a school of piranha" and you'd still have to take it or else be taunted as a "fake ass *****" or something similar. :deal

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl I would still like KP in this fight!!! So, if you want to make a video of you chopping off your nuts, go for it...

 

im already on hatton cant handle 2 months

 

And Kermit Cintron.

 

It has plenty of basis towards everything within the establishment that overrated a flawed fighter who is not even realistically within the mix against his hard hitting contemporaries, but no inexperienced boxing fan is going to agree on this subject and this creates the back and forth arguments.

Anyways, Pavlik by KO, put me down for yet another month added.

 

Who would wanna make a bet with someone who won't be here anyways?

Thats like money betting with someone who doesn't have any money

 

Ummmm, OK?

 

I have already made a avatar bet, and that is as far as I take any bets.

 

Which part didn't you comprehend?

 

The "establishment" overrated JT, huh? What a shame. If only the establishment had consulted you before they collectively made their gross error in judgement.:-( Between you and the establishment, I'm gonna go with you everytime! Who wouldn't? :good

Not "realistically" even "in the mix?"

I can see that your hatred for JT has severely limited your ability to think straight, so let me help you with a simple statement: In "reality" JT is the middleweight champion because he took and then defended the belts from the best middleweight of our generation and even if you think this was "controversial" - that very fact alone (that there is controversy) would *necessarily* mean that he is indeed at least "in the mix." These facts that actually happened in reality make your statements - and your fantasy - just beyond absurd.

So the establishment is on par with inexperienced boxing fans. It's the ESTABLISHMENT that is inexperienced, and you who has genuine experience! The establishment, or anyone who uses "real" events to support their arguments, are just inexperienced twits! Don't they realize that Jermain Taylor is a fraud merely because a nobody on a message board says so and that the real events that happened (aka his FIGHTS) have nothing to do with anything? :tong

Within that evil establishment, as you've acknowleged already, there is no argument. No one thinks Jermain Taylor "isn't even in the mix" unless they are an inexperienced twit like yourself.

Here I can finally give you respect. Even though you spout some of the most absurd bull**** I've ever heard outside the BIBLE, at least you are willing to put your money where your mouth is. I just hope that if Pavlik (a great fighter) wins this fight you won't be daft enough to think it gives you any merit for your previous statements.

 

How about, none of it...