Technical fights.

Let me put it this way, boy.

You can run your mouth all you want, I find it amusing. You are the one that has been wanting to shut me up since I started posting, you are the one that started quoting me and talking **** about me, you were not even on my radar, so you are going to have to come see me.

I posted my scorecards to those Jack fights with explanations, you can agree or disagree like a man, or keep acting like a punk butt hurt *****.

 

Easy to talk tough and call a grown man a boy from the safety of the net quite different to do it in person.

 

Just saying that Hopkins was a fine technician, is all. Spoiling and grinding styles and sound technique are not mutually exclusive concepts. I will say that X vs Winky was better from what's considered a pure technical standpoint than X vs Joe. But I happen to think that someone like Henry Armstrong was a fine technician within the parameters of his style, so I'm not one to view technique in one particular way.

I thought Mayweather-Cotto featured good two way, technically sound action for the first ten rounds or so. Mayweather took over in the final third, but Cotto did well to stay with Mayweather for much of the contest. Had him well behind on my card (I had it 117-112 at the end.) but doesn't detract from the quality of the performance.

 

Oh please. You are such a punk.

I had no idea who you were and you come at me all hard from the safety of your computer over some scorecards. I give it back to you, now you are repeating what I already told you. Yeah, it is easy to talk trash over the computer, and if you came at me in person like you did in your first post to me, you would be too busy looking for your teeth to continue this argument. You got a problem, you know where to find me, boy.

 

LMFAO If you only knew who you were dealing with. Please come and see me here in Houston Texas set the time the date whatever i'm begging you I promise you I'll be there and I'll **** you up.

 

Hopkins is a brilliant fighter, more so than a technical one. Spoiling is a minimalist approach, especially Hopkins, he's crafty but ugly, not really the best showman of technical mechanics. Hopkin's specaility is dragging pretty fighters into ugly affairs. I guess if I had to pick a Hopkins fight for this category, it would be the Trinidad bout.

Yeah, it's a good fight to be sure.

 

More big talk from behind the computer, I'm ****ing shaking, really I am.

Why should I come see you because you have a problem with me? It don't work that way, boy.

 

Barrera vs JMM
James Toney vs Michael Nunn
Mike McCallum vs Donald Curry
Masao Ohba vs Betulio Gonzalez

 

Sounds like we got a fight. I honestly bet you bums could sell out a middle school or something if you wanted. Why not? You are both boxing fans, why not just get your license and go at it? This would be so much fun for the whole forum. Isn't that how Charlie Z got started?

 

I don't even have a problem with the boy. He told me to stop posting, I told him to make me, and this is where we are. I apparently have to request off work, drive all the way to ****ing Houston, so he can make me stop posting I suppose. He seems to like hand outs. hmmm

 

I have a feeling based off of some of his favorite fighters, I can tell he is the type of person to enjoy hand outs LOL.

 

All this coming from a guy with a trump avatar. Just say what you mean dummy don't beat around the bush. We all know what you want to say.

 

SSM versus ODLH I. High level of technical expertise with a lot of action. Shows that one need not be a defensive first minded fighter to show high level technical boxing skills.

 

Larry Holmes vs Butterbean

 

Oscar vs Sweat Pea is one to consider. Two very different but elite level technicians on fire in an even fight.

This content is protected