Terry O'connor Should be sacked immediately

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by BoxingAnalyst, Apr 27, 2011.

  1. scrap

    scrap Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Messages:
    6,437
    Likes Received:
    64
    I thought it a disgrace. Ref never gave Smith a waning for holding or dangerous use of the Head, thought it was called Boxing, not mauling.
     
  2. tazz1234321

    tazz1234321 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seriously someone better pull him up on this. Not one person on this board i don't think had that kind of ridiculous scorecard never mind a 'pro' judge.
     
  3. Scottrf

    Scottrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,547
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just me that heard 118-112 and knew it would be Smith? Those cards never go against the home fighter when it's close. Had it Smith by 1 in rounds, but felt like a fight Simpson won and if anyone won by that margin it was him.
     
  4. harvinmagler

    harvinmagler Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    118-112 was an absolute disgrace I had simpson by a round, what fight was he watching??
     
  5. keith uk

    keith uk Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    0
    if I'm not mistaken i think he was also the ref who gave fury the decision over mcdermott 98-92. :-(
     
  6. Z Man

    Z Man Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    0
    An absolute disgrace of a scorecard from the imcompetent O'Connor, how the hell can you score that fight 118-112 to Smith? A round either way we could have accepted but not this balls, killing the sport and taking away from the hard work warriors like John are.