WHat are you on about man? Diaconu has mandatories right now just as Kessler does.....Diaconu HAS to fight 2 mandatories as stipulated by the WBC which happen to be Branco and Johnson.....Stop being a ****ing hater
Why risk the pay day??? Beating Diaconu isn't going to make the Tarver fight any bigger or make his purse any bigger is it??? But if he beats Tarver then he's a bigger name thus the Diaconu fights gets bigger ESP if Diaconu beats Johnson(which I doubt he will). Understand??? Boxing wether you like it or not is a business and Dawson is being a smart business man thats all. When there was no shot to get Tarver he signed to fight Diaconu and then Diaconu pulled out.
Not at all. What makes you come up with such a theory?? Both are equally good in my opinion. Both have different styles but are equally good at doing what they do:deal
You don't understand or want to understand.If you google Dawson it says the is a ducker,it's what he did.We are over it and looking to the future
What does what you just said have anything o do with this??? If Kessler of Diaconu had a chance to fight a biiger name then there mandatories do you think they wont drop there belts and take it??? If Dawson beats Tarver and Diaconu beats Branco and Dawson offer Diaconu a fight what do you think Diaconu is going to do??? Fight Johnson and keep the belt or take the fight with Dawson that he wants so bad???
You only believe that because your man was the mandatory. Let me ask you this question. If Pavlik beats Hopkins what should he do....... Take his mandatory against Marco Antonio Rubio or should he drop the belt and fight Abraham????