Mayweather easily. JMM has beaten like 9 Top10 contenders in his whole career. Mayweather beat 18. JMM doesn't belong to the same category as Floyd, Jones, etc.
Floyd huh outside of Oscar Corrales and Castillo aren't even close to being on the level of Barrera or Manny ..Judah please Gatti please ? Chop chop
marquez has beat some good fighters but has pac and john who he never won in 3 fights. Floyd has DOMINATED his resume winning titles is 5 divisions and just destroying corrales, gatti, baldo, judah, hatton, hernandez, famoso, chavez 1 handed...he is a far better fighter overall...p4p, head to head or resume
Chop chop nearly chopped Cotto in half. Chop chop was a solid mark. Oh and Castillo and Corrales were better then the version of Barrera that Marquez fought,.
How does a loss tell anything about how good a fighter is? :huh:huh:huh Answer: NOTHING. Taylor, RJJ and Calzaghe are all on Lacy's resume. Those three are better than Pavlik's resume combined... does that mean Lacy is better than Pavlik? And so on.. you could easily find a truely bad journeyman with rows of great fighters on his resume.. is he then really good? No. It is the wins - and nothing else. Losses say nothing at all in favor of the person and should of course not be used to build up the person's resume.
having the balls to fight great fighters but losing doesnt help in anyway. But a win against them will. With that, PBF takes it.
I was leaning towards Floyd before i realized he has fought no one of Pacquiao calibre, that coupled with his more recent wins tips it in JMM's favor.
JMM lost to Pac twice. You dont count losses. If you did, DLH is the greatest fighter in history. Its called a resume. Do you put jobs you were fired at on your resume lol?
I want to say JMM coz I really hate floyd......But no matter how i spin it, there's just no way JMM's resume is better than floyd....Just no way...