He may well be but regardless of whether he is or isnt, he has done more in 20 fights than Wilder in 39. Regardless of whether he is or isnt, he has become a unified champ I wouldnt be shocked if a 30 year old Wlad in that fight may have done better but whos to say a 30 year old Joshua may not go on and do better? Fact is, at the time of the fight, Joshua had only had 18 fights and I would have favoured 18 fight Joshua to have beaten 18 fight Wladimir. That was 27 year old Joshua beating Wladimir. Around that similar age Wladimir was stopped by Brewster and Sanders. I dont think the 41 year old version would have lost
Yes Loudon would be fun to laugh at but you are providing plenty of amusement with your in denial posts lmao. Lets have a bit of fun with your posts I agree with you that beat a 41 year old Wlad coming off a layoff and loss. I pointed out that Wilders last fight was against a lesser opponent who hasnt done anything close to what Wladimir has done as a heavyweight who had been inactive for even longer. This seems to really get to your dumb self. Do you think Wilders win over Stiverne was anything close to as good as Joshuas over Wladimir? Do you not agree that Joshua has achieved more in 20 fights compared to Wilders 39? If you think answers are wimpy, you will find a bigger wimp wont even be able to give a straight answer... Oh that will be you
Possibly I think it could also be if Joshua lands the fight is over. It must be frustrating for Wilder as he has had to play catch up to British HWs with less fights for a while. British HWs do seem to be moved faster I feel Wilder wins a title but gets overtaken by Fury who beats Wladimir and wins a title and has a better resume in far less fights, has Joshua unify and do more in far less fights. Wilder didnt face A Harrison until his 28th fight which was about 6 months after Price had beaten Harrison in his 14th fight which was also behind 2 weight champ Haye in his 26th fight who also has a greater resume It would have been interesting to see where Wilder would be if his career had of been based in the UK from the start LOL
Wilder is being moved fine. A lot of times we (American heavies) move heavies who start their careers late too fast. His amount of fights has zero to do with anything. How long it takes for you to get schooled is a process. One mistake and your career can be over. Wilder has been schooled well and moved well.
Wlads name is bigger than any name on Wilders resume. And Joshua hasn't achieved anything more than Wilder. And the amount of fights doesn't have jack to do with anything.
He has a win over Wlad.....an old inactive Wlad, but still a top 10 ATG heavyweight, who'd still beat everyone on Wilder's resume even now....so you a wrong Joshua has Infact achieved more than Wilder in half the time no less.
Every time you clowns say half the fights you sound clueless. And 41 year old Wlad coming off a long layoff and a loss is only a name on Joshua's scalp. That's the reality Joshua fans so live with it. Wilder and Joshua are on collision course no matter how much you talk about Wilder.
Do you agree or disagree that the version of Wlad that AJ beat, beats everyone that Wilder has faced so far in his long and laborious career? Agree or disagree?
It's possible that 41 year old Wlad coming off of a 17 month layoff and loss could beat everyone on Wilders resume. That's possible. I fail to see the point in that question, lmao. Wlad couldn't beat Wilder, lmao.
The difference is that Wilder doesn't call out past prime bums like Eddie Chambers by sliding into his DMs.
No he was still competitive and beating top tier 10 guys, there's nothing "possible" about it, Wlad cleans up Wilder's resume without breaking a sweat. As for your statement that Wlad couldn't beat Wilder, that's your opinion but it's not a fact. The facts we do know are that Wlad dominated and repeatedly dropped Wilder. So all in all Joshua has Infact achieved more than Wilder.
Wlad at 41 possibly beating everyone on Joshua's or Wilders resume doesn't mean anything as we don't know and will never know. And that isn't fact. And you don't have facts on their sparring match and even if you did so what, lmao. The pros is what counts. And sorry but Joshua hasn't achieved more than Wilder sorry. Neither is the true hvw champion. That's why they fight the fights.
Yes you are correct the pros are what count.... So far prior to losing to Fury Wlad was beating top 10 opposition. Wlads last 2, albeit losing fights where against 2 of the top guys in the division. Wilder has fought 1 guy who was a lower top 10 guy in Stiverne. Both Joshua and Parker have beaten Takam who is better than Stiverne. Fury and Joshua beating Wlad is better than anything Wilder has done, as is Bellew beating Haye.