The evolution of boxing

HerolGee · Aug 26, 2015

kingfisher3 said: ↑

i think ali had a big effect on boxing's popularity to mainstream viewers but less to actual participation.
Click to expand...

totally

ribtickler68 · Aug 27, 2015

HerolGee said: ↑

evolution is just fitting in with the current rules/environement best - it has NEVER meant "getting better". It just means a better fit to the way things are currently.

A human is no more evolved than an amoeba in its bestfit environment.

boxing is just the same as every other evolution/"bestfit", its not an exception. those arguing that its better than ever are the ones making the false claim and clearly dont know what evolution is. They probably see the word "evolution" in car/sports adverts that want to sell them stuff, and assume that dumbarz advertisers know what it means so they follow their meaning. blind leading the blind.
Click to expand...

I don't buy it, either. I don't see better fighters than Hagler, Duran, McCallum or Leonard, today. Is Froch better than **** Tiger? Is Amir Khan better than Aaron Pryor? Someone compared Eubank Jr and Billy Joe Saunders's rivalry to Finnegan-Minters' recently! It's total *******s!

Log in or Sign up

The evolution of boxing

HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

The evolution of boxing

HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member