Lol. First of all. Ive never called you crazy. Im more creative than that. Id be more inclined to call you a ****-riddled ****. Secondly, go back and read the other posts. You've had your explanation, but since you're so easliy confused, here's a quick summary: Wlad's resume is extremely weak. He's never beaten anyone decent and has some very dubious losses. Is it his fault the competition is ****? No. But it will leave him with a **** legacy. There are still doubts about his heart and his chin and he'll never be up there with the greats until another elite fighter comes along who can test these things. Its probably too late for that now. This thread is about the Klitschko fans, and some of the things they have written on this thread (particularly about Wlads opponents) are frankly bizarre and stretch the truth to the point of absurdity. Most of them resort to mentioning Haye's poor resume in an attempt to divert attention away from the fact that you can't defend Wlad. How you can say im "joking" is appauling considering you tried to tell me Larry Holmes would be competitive in this era and that Buster Douglas is a great of the past. Check out other peoples reactions in this thread and others for confirmation on how much of a "joke" that is. atsch Have you got it yet?
At the time Castillo was hailed as **** opponent who didnt have any business being in the ring with Wlad. Only one in the world who think he was good and dangerous opponent, was Klitchko nuthugger widdow maker.
That is correct. You resort to mentioning Wald's poor in an attempt to divert attention away from the fact that you can't defend Haye.
Every bit of what Silencer posted was spot on truth & you know it. That' s why you don't know where to begin.................