The Klitschko fans

1 & 2) He has a say because it meant finalising a contract afterward would put his belt at risk

3) There are a disproportionate amount of K supporters on this site who come with rubbish thats just like that.
Also, its only a logical assumption if you believe Haye was the sole reason all those negotiations failed. With so many other fighters claiming the Ks were greedy negotiators, that would be pretty naive.

 

A unification trumps a mandatory defence.

 

wrong... wlad had every intension of signing the contract asap.

btw... the date was Jan 5th not the 11th... haye was ginen that cut off date from day 1..... Haye has promosed this and that and then when the contract hits his desk... he either hides or changes the deal and his mind. It was only verbal so wlad took the chisora fight incase haye pulled the same ****. All haye had to do was sign and wlad would have signed as well..... right away... not after the chisora fight

 

Watch how quick that becomes a non-issue in their book.:yep

 

EXACTLY
Funny how Adamek can do it... but davey boy cant

 

You said it yourself ... The only thing Haye needs to do is to squeeze in a fight in between. You are getting yourself all worked up for no reason. :fight

 

Haye said: "Fight me next, July 2nd"

Wlad said: "Sure. And I am going to bash up Chisora as a tune up."

Haye said: "Then I won´t fight you July 2nd."

Wlad said: "But you are most welcome to."

Haye said: "Nope."

 

again.. all Haye had to do was sign the contract.... he would only verbal agree to terms even though he knew about the cut off date... so wlad wasnt going to get screwed again by not fighting wating for David then David hides and wont sign. The deal could have been worked out... look at Adamek... perfect example

I still dont see the issue...... if haye was so willing to fight, why only verbal agreements?... all haye has to do is fight his mand... move the fight to september... and he can fight wlad and retire..... what kills me is the reasons Haye said no to wlad but then turns around and wants winner of Vitali0solis which had the EXACT same time issues that were such a concern for Haye with Wlad

 

Generally yes, but it is not automatic. Haye will need a special permit to unify instead of going through mandatory and it is a political decision within WBA.

 

Even so, it would be silly to assume the WBA will make him fight a mandatory instead and then slag the man off for it.

 

But then Wlad-Chisora fights is irrelevant to WBA decision. Haye can make an prelimiary agreement with Klitschkos for July 2nd. WBA can still consider special permit and grant it conditionally, so that Haye either fights for unification or fights Chagaev as mandatory on July 2nd.

 

Yeah.... or Wlad could have just fought Haye first.

 

Absolute ****. Sorry, but that is horrendous.

If one of those is more career defining than a fight with Haye, then Wlad has no legacy, full stop.