great that HBO allegedly want adamek in newark vs someone like peter, chambers or tony thompson. chambers is high risk, little reward (but agreat small man's heavyweight fight). peter is another big puncher ala arreola - so we perhaps don't need that again. tony thompson would be useful as a test, due to his height (and he has some history with golota, i think, which could make it interesting).
They all say the same thing after everyfight. I don't even pay attention to it. Adamek will get TKOed by Bell, he is too small, and can't take a real CW punch. Outcome : Bell quits on his stool. Adamek will be decisioned if not TKOed by Cunningham, Cunningham is too fast, and too slick for Adamek. Adamek struggles against these kinds of fighters. Adamek is too limited, he just isnt that good. Outcome : Adamek knocks Cunningham on his ass 3 times throughout the fight, clearly winning the fight. Jonathan Banks is a real dangerous fight. He is no washed up Bell, and has a hell of a punch. Adamek is biting off more then he can chew this time. Banks will KHTFO. Outcome : Adamek KTFO Banks. Arreola is way too much for Adamek. Adamek will get KTFO no doubt. He isnt made for the HW division, and his chin won't be able to hold up to Arreolas huge power. Adamek is way too small. Outcome : Adamek pops away on Arreola all night long, making Arreola look like he was attacked by a swarm of hornets. Clearly winning the fight, without being hurt once.
Its because those people dont know Adamek at all. As Poles we understand much better how tough fighter he is. I dont like to compare todays fighters to fighters from past, but one thing clearly comes to my mind: Adamek has similar mentality to Rocky Marciano or Evander Holyfield. Its something that never allows you to surrend and you dont fear when fighting bigger guys. In other words, Adamek's mentality is in the opposition to other great polish fighter Andrew Golota. If Golota had Adamek's mentality then in the 90s, he would have become an ATG.
Seriously i would be afraid of a chambers fight , he's slick, fast adamek doesnt like that kind of fighters and i think i would slghtly favour him over adamek David Haye imo is the easiest fight for adamek if we talk about top fighters. I like Haye myself but he's so overrated by some of the british posters that many ppl believe he's modern great, when he clearly isnt. he lacks defense and has a bad chin. Adamek would take him out in the later rounds.
I like him Haye too, but Adamek is too skilled and I see Adamek winning by decision. Late stoppage is also possible. Still Haye is faster and more powerful, but Adamek is too disciplined fighter to lose that one. To me its a 50/50 fight and Adamek being the smarter boxer, should win that fight. Chambers was very badly KOed by Wlad, it always leaves something in the mind. Ricky Hatton as an example. I dont say that Chambers would be afraid of Adamek, but he may become worse fighter, box much more safety.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XW9XdJahEU[/ame] Funny stuff. "I am smartest" - cracks me up:rofl:rofl:rofl
Does anybody has the entrance to the ring? I didnt see it Edit: I have found it already [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wq4lWlBSG4k[/ame]
The only HW fight I want to see Adamek involved in now is against Haye (or maybe a winnable tune-up en route to Haye - someone like a Chazz Witherspoon...or Rahman, or Beck...anybody nice and slow and not too dangerous). Conduct your business, win the superfight, AVOID the Klitschkos, and go back to rule CW. Please.
Adamek is probably not moving down anytime soon, although if he were to lose against a Haye or a Klit, he could perhaps move down for the Cunningham rematch--maybe.
Quite a few ESB experts are saying how Haye will beat the Klitschkos. If Adamek beats Haye you think he'll say no thanks to K2?