The Theory of "Modern Training Methods" Being Superior

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by salsanchezfan, Oct 20, 2010.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,990
    48,070
    Mar 21, 2007

    Tyson did work with weights in his first incarnation. But as I understand it, he worked with them as much as he was allowed rather than how much he wanted to. Maybe Ironchamp or somebody can come in and illuminate this a bit further.

    Cus didn't rate weights. Some people are going to have you believe that Patterson and Tyson would have been more explosive with them...
     
  2. Monte Fisto

    Monte Fisto Active Member Full Member

    602
    1
    Oct 15, 2009

    i know this because i was a collegiate track and field athlete and when you are throwing a shot or discus and only given 7 or 8 1/2 feet of space to generate speed and power to throw it those are the lifts you use to do that.

    Look, I like smokin joe but if he mumbled that to me i wouldnt think anything of it, because i know that if joe did plyos, and said lifts he would have been ever faster and more powerful
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,990
    48,070
    Mar 21, 2007
    Also...whilst Joe Frazier despised weights...it should be stressed that Marvis Frazier loved them :yep
     
  4. Monte Fisto

    Monte Fisto Active Member Full Member

    602
    1
    Oct 15, 2009

    I cant answer for them
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I know, that´s why I thought Tyson didn´t do them. He did do plenty of weights after prison this is clearly visible but I don´t think he was more explosive.
     
  6. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    People ITT are limiting strength training to just free weights, which is ****ing stupid. Traditional boxing training does have strength training. Calisthenics and core bodyweight exercises? Heavy bag drills? Rowing machines? Sledge training? Aren't these all part of a fighters strength training programs, some of which are plyometric in nature?

    The truth is that free weights are just a replacement for the strength training that has been in boxing for ages. Strongman work like Louis lifting 75-100lb ice blocks in his youth, Fitzsimmons' blacksmith work which developed his upperbody, Jim Jeffries' singlehandedly making boilers out of cast iron with no machinery? Do people not equate these activities with contributing to a fighter's physical strength greatly? Or do they just not know?
     
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    And because it made sense for throwing a discus, where you make exactly one thing and train only for this, it makes sense for boxing, where you are not only throwing punches but have to do many other things too?
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,990
    48,070
    Mar 21, 2007
    I agree that power might be improved in track and field by weight training.

    That's not what we're talking about though, is it?


    Yeah, and you think that Patterson, Tyson, Dempsey (who did train weights a little bit in fairness), Robinson and Roy Jones would be more explosive, too...you seem to really believe these things.

    What I want to know is, where are all the super-explosive athletes that DID train weights that are more explosive than these guys? Why is it only those who despise/didn't rate weight training that are super-explosive? Where are the guys who know your secret and are more explosive than the above through knowing it?

    To be fair though, these men all trained diligently in body resistance excersises, which are the type of weights that you have named specifically, anyway, I think. But here again, we see why training weights isn't some explosive balm for fighters.
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Of course you can´t. It was a rethorical question anyway. If fighters who want to compete at the absolute best do or don´t do something it probably has a reason. So, if explsive fighters like Jones don´t do, or only in a very limited amount, weights than maybe it is because they don´t add much or any to his training.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,990
    48,070
    Mar 21, 2007


    Good post man. This argument is getting a little silly and this is a good post.


    I don't doubt, actually, that you could replace these things with a really good weights program along the lines that Monte Fisto is talking about and get something like the same results, but suddenly "more explosive"? Absolutely not.

    Like if Roy had trained weights diligently at SMW he would have been MORE explosive than he was. When he started using weights he became less explosive.
     
  11. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    :good
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,990
    48,070
    Mar 21, 2007

    He was less explosive generally according to my eye, after he started training weights. Not by much, and perhaps not only/specifically because of weight training, but that's the way I see it.
     
  13. Monte Fisto

    Monte Fisto Active Member Full Member

    602
    1
    Oct 15, 2009

    Yes, because if i didnt do those lifts i would have been slower getting across the circle, thus not generating enough speed and torque to throw the implement as far as possible.

    just like boxing, if you dont use those lifts you are not as quick as you could be to dodge a punch and explode with a counter. the final stance of throwing a shot is the exact same as throwing a right cross (arm is just at a different angle) you generate power up from the ground on the ball of your foot, rotating the foot thus generating power up through your core and torso and fire your arm out and turn your wrist over. the lifts help you do that in a quicker more explosive way, which would translate to a more affective and powerful punch. it's all relative
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,143
    13,099
    Jan 4, 2008
    Tyson for one did start lifting weights post prison and it did increase his power. Jones must surely have lifted weights training for Ruiz?

    There are after all a lot of fighters today who lift weights. They must be getting some from it.

    But weights is really just a part. Supplements and diet based on scientific findings is probably significantly more important. I'd say that very few boxers ignore these. You also have superior methods of checking the status of the body and more knowledge of how to optimize this status.

    I feel just as non-plussed. Wer'e talking about tarining that enhances the muscles perfomance. Why wouldn't they aplly to boxing?

    A lot of it is not done by practicing specific techniques, but rather by work in the gym and superior diet and supplements. In for example football and tennis they have been used to increae players work rate, strength and explosiveness. I'd giess the same is true for baseball, basketball and American Football as well. But not for boxing?

    Of course 190 lbs guys will have better stamina in general than 230-260 lbs guys, but relative to size I think the well trained fighters of today have better stamina. There just was nothing even close to Wlad etc back in the day.

    I disagree. But I should say that I don't think modern methods have revolutionzied the sport in any way. Just that there's been some improvement in some areas. (And this doesn't, in theory, mean that there can't have been decline in other areas)

    However, I'll bow out here. This discussion has been done many times before and this specific thread will go on for a while yet, but Idon't really have much to add.


    EDIT: I should probably been more specific with "explosive". I meant in relation to mass, i e power. It should also be pointed out that pads came in use in the 70's it seems (Garfield claims as much). This could perhaps have brought some improvements.
     
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Your wrong on numerous counts. Firstly you talk about 'weights' as if all weight exercises and routines produce the same results. If Jones became less explosive he was using the wrong exercises/techniques

    If certain weights exercises did not develop explosive speed then Olympic weight lifters would not be faster over 40yards than Olympic sprinters, that research was conducted in the 60s-70s and it speak volumes. Exercises like the Snatch/Clean/Jerk are the most explosive multi-joint movements possible. They are very technical movements however, boxers rarely do them and nearly never improve on them. Anyone who improves on them gets more explosive and faster. I've taken boxers on the pads before and after a session of power jerks and they always punch with more power after, and thats just 1 session

    The problem with general weight training of specific muscles is it can develop strength in certain areas while neglecting other, thus creating weak links in the body chain. This makes boxers more cumbersome and less balanced, overall perhaps slower.

    Boxers are actually rarely gym rats anyway and this is not a modern phenonmenon as John Garfield has testified regarding the great Willie Pep

    As for the question in hand, the only boxers today properly utilising modern training sciences are Ariza and the Klits, both with excellent results. Fred Hatfield had excellent results with Holyfield, although I

    Boxing is relatively untapped in the potential of using modern training science to benefit boxers