***The Top 50 Wins Of The Decade, 2000-2009***

Good List but I put Pac-MAB 1 as the No 1. That was the most amazing win/performance, and also very unexpected. 4-1 underdog with that kind of unexpected performance?? This win for Pac should be a clear winner over Mosley-DLH.

I also will rate Pac-EM 2 higher than Pac-EM 1. Pac-EM 1 was not a legit loss for Pac. There's a conspiracy there that the commission lost Pac's medical which in turn required Pac to get a Blood Drawn very close to the fight(2 days b-4 the fight) Morales beat a weakened Pac who was moving up in weight and was also handicapped by a Bad cut cause by a headbut from rd 5 which the referee called as by a punch.

While Pac-EM 2 was a revenge fight and the 1st Ko loss for Morales who was at that time was thought to have a granite chin. It was competitive fight for 5 rds, then Pac turns into Pacman and swallow Morales whole.

I rate Pac-DLH higher too. I dont buy the excuses. Pac was 3-1 underdog going into fight. Even after the weigh-in, Pac was still a big underdog.

Donaire KO of dachinyan also will be on my top 10. Donaire was 7-1 underdog. The Ko was spectacular. Dachinyan was rated top 12 p4p that time, just fresh from annihilating the recent challengers. He even almost killed Burgos. Pacdbest was even crucified for picking Donaire that time.

 

Yes. It's my new favourite TV show. :good

 

THANK YOU

for the positive comments so far. There have been some valid criticisms too, cheers for all comments.


I'll try to answer some direct points here:

Lewis-Klitschko was stopped on the basis of a cut. Therefore in my eyes, Lewis did not win the fight, the fight was awarded to him because Klitschko suffered an injury. That may go down as a technical knockout, but it's a bit too 'technical' for my liking. As I acknowledge in my starting post, you could argue that since Lewis's punching caused the cut then it's a great win, and of course you would not be 'wrong' as such, but I disagree personally. A TKO on cuts is not a conclusive win IMO.

Many people will dispute the two wins over Morales that I have ranked fairly highly (Raheem and Pac II) because the feeling is that Morales was shot. Again, that opinion is every bit as valid as my own, but all I can do is give my own opinion, and my opinion is that many people give Morales a free pass for his losses because of their affection for the great warrior. I don't, not for those two fights, which came hot on the heel of the greatest win of his career.

No, most definitely not any honourable mention for Lewis-Tyson, not even close. Sorry, that fight is not even on my radar at all, I wouldn't have it in a top 200.

I think the very idea that you would mention weight is utterly ridiculous. Cotto weighed 146 vs Clottey, then 145 vs Pac. 1 pound for a man like Cotto is lost going for a shite after a curry dinner. Nonsense.

Pacquiao scores very high for Quality of Performance, he utterly dominated Cotto in a way no-one else has come close to doing.

No, of course not. If my scoring was biased, I would have included Pacquiao vs Marquez 2 in my list, because I am a Pacquiao fan before I am a Hopkins fan, Pacquiao is my man. Many people feel Hopkins edged the Taylor and Calzaghe fights. Many people value clean, effective work over mere workrate.

Margarito beat Cotto worse than Pacquiao did? Sober up.

And how Miguel Cotto felt during these losses is irrelevant, the thread is called Top 50 Wins, not "Miguel Cotto's Most Unpleasant Evenings Chart".

I did make my feelings on that issue known in post#1 on this thread amigo, but it's cool that you missed it as I did write far, far too much! Basically, yes, I do believe Margarito cheated that night and I'm not prepared to include it, even though it was a ****ing fantastic fight.

Haye-Mormeck makes my Honourable Mentions, I think Froch was repeating the trick Pavlik done but at a worse weight for Taylor, so it doesn't make the grade IMO.

I'm not very interested in the Brit Forum mate. Most of the friends I have on here (Addie, Bill Butcher, etc) are fellow Brits, but none of my favourite fighters are British and I don't have much interest in the domestic scene, so I prefer the General and Classic.

Calzaghe-Jones wouldn't make my

This content is protected

. Get off my thread you braindead ****, this is for serious fans.

 

The parts I have not highlighted are fair enough, but the part in red is ludicrous. You are giving us *******s a bad name here :fire

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=221279

That was my thread on Pacquiao-Marquez 2. I scored it 114-114.