So this was dug up because Pacquiao's past was recently dug up? One thing you never hear me do is criticize a boxer for his past or personality outside of the ring. It's tit for tat with these fans.
Everyone knew about his past but I think a lot of it has been glossed over and shoved under the rug for whatever reason. The article really brings the details to the light and exposes Floyd Mayweather Jr as the small-man-syndrome-having shitbird that he really is. Honestly, after reading the article in full it's hard to imagine some will still defend this guy. Not that boxers are supposed to be saints, but sucker punching women and threatening your own children? Christ.
different from the best boxer of his era:good that;s pac. also proved my point. he became one without beating the best boxing can offer.:deal
A bigger problem is that he will probably fight till he's forty without giving anyone the satisfaction of seeing him lose. It's going to hurt a lot of feelings.
your reaching.....how is he the best boxer this era when he has ALWAYS been considered the underdog against Floyd????
Read the article. Don't skim through it with a hand over one eye trying to retain the image of your idol
we know that is false since to be honest the only reason he is the draw he is today is because the 0.......so it seems people do care about the 0
***** Defense Force trying to derail this thread :rofl Face it, your idol is a chicken **** coward that beats women for fun.
That's more of a casual fan thing honestly ..Most die hard boxing fans could care less ..Good for his marketability but in the years to come people will just want to know who he fought .