thinking about betting on maskaev +300

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lenin, Dec 11, 2007.


  1. lillarry

    lillarry Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,978
    0
    May 13, 2007
    :think
     
  2. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006
    I can't believe Roy Jones, and Kelly Pavlik are underdogs.
     
  3. JMotrain

    JMotrain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,682
    2,621
    Sep 30, 2005
    They aren't. Good bets.
     
  4. lillarry

    lillarry Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,978
    0
    May 13, 2007
    No they are actually the favorites.

    -= Favorite
    +=underdog
     
  5. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006
    :patsch So does that mean that Sam Peter is the underdog against Maskaev?
     
  6. lillarry

    lillarry Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,978
    0
    May 13, 2007
    No hes -450, so Peter is the favorite. Meaning you would have to put $450 down in order to get a $100 dollar return
     
  7. JMotrain

    JMotrain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,682
    2,621
    Sep 30, 2005
    I'd take Pavlik at -240 because he has about a 90% chance of winning within 4 rounds and 100% of winning within 10 rounds.
     
  8. JMotrain

    JMotrain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,682
    2,621
    Sep 30, 2005
    BTW I don't give Maskaev a 25% shot (the break even point), I think he is going to get KO'd, no doubt about it.
     
    Charles White likes this.
  9. lillarry

    lillarry Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,978
    0
    May 13, 2007
    Heart is with Taylor. Head says go with the champ
     
  10. lillarry

    lillarry Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,978
    0
    May 13, 2007
    I think its even bet for the first 6 rounds and 90% in favor of Kelly after that. Jermain Taylor stamina and ability to make the necessary adjustments is the key to the fight
     
  11. JMotrain

    JMotrain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,682
    2,621
    Sep 30, 2005
    Would you take Oleg at +300? I sure as hell wouldn't.

    BTW I think Taylor is rushing to fight Pavlik and anything under -300 for Pavlik is a great bet.
     
  12. lillarry

    lillarry Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,978
    0
    May 13, 2007

    Its tempting, but no:bart
     
  13. Bashed Crab

    Bashed Crab Member Full Member

    126
    0
    Jul 26, 2004
    I just had a look at the ko-odds site andthey have pinnacle running Maskeav at 4.75 which from memory is overs on +300. If he gets out to 4-1/5.00, I reckon I would have a bite at that...Hey speaking of ******ed odds, Centrebet had Manfredo at 10.00 for his fight against ths shot to pieces Lacey..he didn;t win but that is massive overs me tinks.
     
  14. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
  15. ralphc

    ralphc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,352
    0
    Jan 11, 2007
    Before the McCline fight I would have bet my life savings on Peter to beat Maskaev. Of all people, McCline exposed Peter's weakness for the uppercut. Now that the secret has been revealled, Peter is just a knockout waiting to happen. It is well within Maskaev's ability to get the job done. There is always a risk in gambling, but at +300, the risk is worth the reward.