No hes -450, so Peter is the favorite. Meaning you would have to put $450 down in order to get a $100 dollar return
I'd take Pavlik at -240 because he has about a 90% chance of winning within 4 rounds and 100% of winning within 10 rounds.
BTW I don't give Maskaev a 25% shot (the break even point), I think he is going to get KO'd, no doubt about it.
I think its even bet for the first 6 rounds and 90% in favor of Kelly after that. Jermain Taylor stamina and ability to make the necessary adjustments is the key to the fight
Would you take Oleg at +300? I sure as hell wouldn't. BTW I think Taylor is rushing to fight Pavlik and anything under -300 for Pavlik is a great bet.
I just had a look at the ko-odds site andthey have pinnacle running Maskeav at 4.75 which from memory is overs on +300. If he gets out to 4-1/5.00, I reckon I would have a bite at that...Hey speaking of ******ed odds, Centrebet had Manfredo at 10.00 for his fight against ths shot to pieces Lacey..he didn;t win but that is massive overs me tinks.
Before the McCline fight I would have bet my life savings on Peter to beat Maskaev. Of all people, McCline exposed Peter's weakness for the uppercut. Now that the secret has been revealled, Peter is just a knockout waiting to happen. It is well within Maskaev's ability to get the job done. There is always a risk in gambling, but at +300, the risk is worth the reward.