Thoughts on Vitali vs Dragon

Mendoza was a decent poster outside of his internet rivalries with mcvey & SuzieQ.

I thought there was atleast one round where Sosnowski was being aggressive and Vitali did next to nothing. I didn't pay too much attention on the fight though and may be mistaken.

 

He is definitely biased a lot of the time but he wasn't entirely clueless on boxing history either. Knew a lot about Jeffries and the other old timers, and seemed to have a decent collection of rare film.

 

Most certainly not. When you're used to posters like frankenfrank and others, Mendoza looks objective and fair in comparison. I did find his exaggeration of the Louis-Baer knockdown rather funny (Louis doing a "backflip" from Baer's punch), as well as some other posts he has written.

 

Is this forum your entire life or something?

Sad but it seems true.

 

I don't know about the rest, but frankenfrank is very odd. He doesn't seem to care about actually watching boxing, but discusses it based on what he has read on BoxRec. He thinks the likes of Ross Puritty, Oliver McCall and David Tua are top class heavyweights, while Eddie Machen and Cleveland Williams are tomato cans.

 

Mendoza was a good poster, not great, but 10 times better than someone like Pachilles.

It's like Duran spit in his face or something.