Three Pacman bouts lined up in 2009

Its Gonna be Pac Vs. Hatton If pac wins either Floyd (If Floyd feels like it Maybe he will cha ching $$$$$$$$$$$) or JMM. After that Cotto. **** Valero forget Guzman and dont even start with judah those fights are BS.

 

:yep seriously.

if theres no floyd, manny should fight campbell, then winner of diaz-marquez.

i understand its all about the "money fights" in 2009 for manny but valero & guzman are unproven/unworthy opponents. i'd rather see pac-judah then those clowns.

 

pac is setting up a very tough schedule for himself. hatton, possibly mayweather and maybe even jmm all in a span of 7 months if he really plans to retire by the end of the 2009. the guy's not only a warrior but a f***ing animal. scheduling 3 fights in 7 months that's unreal at this level.

 

Bob Arum is a funny guy.


what if Pacquiao loses to Hatton? there goes your plans.

i think Pac will win actually but Hatton does have the fight in him to beat Manny. i just dont like that he's looking so far ahead without giving consideration to the people that he's mentioning. no one should think that Manny is absolutely guaranteed to beat Ricky Hatton.

 

arum and roach were already looking far ahead when they even mentioned pac fighting hatton and mayweather before the dlh fight. but that certainly didn't affect pac at all in that fight.

maybe this looking forward thing actually gives pac more motivation and focus since he knows that he has to win the hatton fight for all these other plans to proceed. pac actually said in an interview before the dlh fight that he had to win vs. dlh so he can have the opportunity to fight hatton and/or mayweather next.

 

Actually, aside from them fighting Pac, i I always wanted the three of them fighting each other since 3years ago...It would be great to see that bro

 

not saying your wrong but i never heard any of them talk about later bouts like that. at the same time i didnt go looking through every interview.

i see what youre saying though. its just funny to me that hes mentioning Hatton as if he shouldnt have any concerns about the outcome of that fight.

 

Arum is just doing his job as the con-man that he is.......

......you talk ahead to bigger fights, and in turn if a Pac fight goes to the scorecards, he has the better chance to have close enough rounds go his way.

You think that if the Hatton fight is close enough, that Pac is'nt guaranteed to win, even though Hatton may have clearly have beaten him.

.......judges read all this looking ahead to fights through the media, and I have no question that if they deep down may think that Hatton had just edged a round......a judge through being manipulated through the media as Arum is doing now, has a good chance to cheat and give the round to Pac to save a Mayweather fight.

Con men like Arum do it all the time.

 

common man. are you still complaining about the jmm rematch not being scored like yours? everyone has a close scorecard regardless of who is the winner, even the 3 official judges. your scorecard was hugely tilted towards jmm. this superstar conspiracy theory of yours is a hogwash.

 

divac, here you go again w/ your conspiracy theories. :-( but rather than jmm vs. pac, it is now hatton vs. pac. don't worry, this fight will probably not go into a decision since both these fighters always go for KOs and are not conservative. you know something about conservative fighters, right? like a certain fighter who always has close fights even against opposition that he is supposed to dominate.

 

Guys, JMM-Pac is over, get over it and "move on!"

I did not mention JMM!

Deal with the thread subject!!!!yep

 

lol. nice one divac.

i wish jmm the best and i hope he beats juan diaz to setup a pac-jmm3 at 135 or 140. forget floyd if he doesn't want to fight pacman. jmm is the real challenge. :good

 

Diaz, then Campbell, and a nice way to call it a career imo would be for the Undisputed lightweight champion JMM to matchup with the King at 140 lbs and say adios to boxing!:yep

Assuming Hatton beats Pac, as I think he will........but if he does'nt, I guess we might have to put up with a 3rd installment of JMM vs Pac!

 

i'm glad that you feel that jmm should not revolve on pacman anymore and should try to carve his own legacy at 135. even if hatton beat pac, a pac-jmm3 still is a good fight at 135. 140 is still a weight stranger to pac and losing in it means he did not carry his weight at 140, no big deal. winning at 147 against DLH is just a calculated risk by team pac considering they have inside info in roach about oscar's capacity.

 

Assuming Pac loses to Hatton, and JMM is the top of the class at 135 lbs, I'd much rather JMM fight Hatton than Pac for a third time.

Not only would there be more money for JMM for a Hatton fight.......but our differences aside pnn.......you know my take on those JMM-Pac fights.
I'm honest, and I believe what I'm posting......
......again, assuming the scenarios unfold and Pac loses to Hatton, I really do think that JMM has a better chance of winning a close decision against Hatton, than a fight thats not so close in favor of JMM against Pac.

More money, and likely a better shake from the judges for JMM against Hatton.

I'm sorry pnn, but my feeling is that JMM can never win a fight thats competitive against Pac, even though in most peoples minds he might well win clearly on the scorecards.

If I'm GBP and the scenarios I just mentioned unfold.....its to GBP's better interest, and the interest of their fighters, since GBP promotes both JMM and Hatton......to go with a JMM-Hatton matchup!

The undisputed Lightweight Champion of the World JMM, against the King at 140 lbs that just toppled Manny Pacquiao!

Just my honest view on the matter.