Tommy Hearns V ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by George Crowcroft, Aug 21, 2019.


  1. Tramell

    Tramell Hypocrites Love to Pray & Be Seen. Mathew 6:5 Full Member

    4,474
    3,857
    Sep 21, 2012
    True. He might not have the power to KO Hearns, but he wasn't feather-fisted. Really fast flurries, but now that I think about it, if Mullins? had him on the ropes on ***** street, Hearns does to him what Julian did, only he doesn't stagger back up.

    OK, you convinced me!:)
     
    mark ant and Bronze Tiger like this.
  2. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,815
    4,562
    Jul 14, 2009
    Canelo is not the best of the bunch.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,565
    May 4, 2017
    Maybe not at 154 but he is far better than McCallum was at 160 etc. The talent was there he was just just green at 154, his punches are harder at 160 too.
     
  4. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,815
    4,562
    Jul 14, 2009
    I think Mc Callum outpoints Canelo at 160 pounds.Just remember, He fought on fairly even terms with James Toney at that weight.And this was a young and in shape Toney.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  5. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,183
    45,087
    Mar 3, 2019
    These fights are at 147 and 154
     
    mark ant likes this.
  6. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,169
    19,369
    Oct 4, 2016
    No way is Tommy Hearns going 8-0 with this bunch, he loses to somebody. Stewart didn't want Hearns in the ring with Mugabi at the time.
     
  7. Grapefruit

    Grapefruit Active Member Full Member

    1,215
    943
    Dec 19, 2017
    Beats all of them except gets knocked by Terry Norris.

    Mike McCallum might have a good shot here, he was a iron jawed body killer and on paper that's a nightmare for hearns.