Tommy Hearns vs. Paul Williams

I suggest a South Asian caning for the two dipsh*ts who voted Williams. Unless they were joking, in which case it's all good.

 

Williams the new Hearns? Theres no comparison!! Williams has a similiar type body, but fights NOTHING like Hearns!

I just started a thread about that very subject, maybe you can get some insight there:

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=35134

 

Interesting, maybe you should look at this thread I made(which was created befor your thread).

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=34450&highlight=Paul+Tommy+Hearns

 

Wtf?? Get This Thread Out Of Here

 

:rofl

 

Hearns KO 2...maybe KO 1

 

This thread is close. 76 more votes for Williams in a row, and it's dead even.

 

The difference is in there boxing skills. Hearns wasn't just some puncher, he was a boxer/puncher. Hearns boxing skills>>>>>>>>>>Williams. On top of that he had more power, his jab is 10X better, and he didn't lack any defensive liabilities like Paul Williams does. The point is Hearns was a more polished boxer. There is hardly any technical flaws in style, while Williams has plenty to improve upon.

 

And Williams is no master boxer.

 

exactly..not with that weak ass jab

 

Hearns in his prime was just way more of a mature and stronger fighter than Williams is now. Tommy moves better, hits harder, and is more versatile. Not even a contest.

Although I do agree that Williams is a great prospect and his skills can be developed into something great years down the road but he would get flattened by the motor city cobra.

 

Hearns KO1.

 

nah man.

 

then PW's mother wakes him up and tells him to stop dreaming.

 

A "master boxer" who won a close fight over Margarito. Hearns would knock Margarito clean out, and Paul Williams comes no where close to winning a decision over Hearns.

Close poll, by the way.