leonard is five foot ten and hagler is about five foot nine these other blokes are roughly around five foot five:think
I think we can assume most boxers are a 1/2 inch to 3 inches shorter that they're listed. Leonard himself has said he's 5'9.
yes so if you use mathematics the equation would still have these blokes deemed short which would have the right hand trajectory of hearns pummeling jake in the same fashion as roberto and pipino,:think
Hagler is 5'8" Leonard is 5'9" LaMotta is 5'8" Duran is 5'7" Before you go spewing your diarrhea speculations and convictions, why don't you try searching for facts first?
So answer the question: Why didn't Hearns do that to Hagler? Hagler is the same height as LaMotta, but both are only one inch taller than Duran...
hagler and leonard have better resumes than roberto pipino and jake and if hagler gave hearns a rematch he probably would of gotten kayoed:think
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
Manny Pacquiao and Danny DeVito are the exact same height. ...As a matter of fact, ever see the two together? :think ...I smell the mother of all Oscars.
Duran and LaMotta have incredible resumes, so again, check your facts, and the rematch opinion of yours is, well, an opinion. And probably wrong again based on Hagler's initial dominance and history of always doing better in rematches... Back to the issue... So now resumes help a fighter's chin? This is your latest reach for logic...
hearns had leonard and hagler both hurt and just did not have the win to finish them off for some reason hearns tired quickly which made his legs very rubbery:think
What a revelation... By the way- What makes you think he finishes Jake, even if he did manage to hurt him? LaMotta's conditioning has never been in question. Oh yeah... It has to be his height! He's too short. Hearns would finish him.