Yeah i know that he is talented. But is not top 10 p4p yet. He will be in the future. Yeah so basically 3 differnt fighters should be obviously added and the order should be changed. IMO that is the definition of a shite list!
I think he had 8 of the 10 most talented fighters on his list. I don't think that Dawson needs to be removed. Alot of people will argue over the order. The only indefensible selections were having Mosely and Barrera on that list instead of Calzaghe and Cotto. Once again, I didn't say it was a good list, but if he made those two changes it would be respectable.
1. Floyd Mayweather Jr. 2. Bernard Hopkins 3. Pacquiao 4. Winky Wright 5. Dawson 6. |Cotto/Calzaghe 7. Juan Manuel Marquez 8. Rafael Marquez 9. Calzaghe/Cotto 10. Hatton Is respectable?
Yes. It wouldn't be my list, but it's respectable. There's no exact science to these lists, I've seen people who write for boxing websites and magazines with worse lists.
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl Mosley at 6.....Cotto not even top 10? atsch :rofl :rofl :rofl Barrera still at 9 :rofl :rofl Dawson!!!!???
Alot of people would obviously put him in there over Dawson. You could make a good argument either way.
This is why it's not respectable as it is. There's no defense for having Barrera and Mosely on the list. Barrera is retired, and Mosely is on his way out. Not to mention, neither of them have looked all that good in the ring for a while.