Bradly maybe threw 10% more punches in the fight per compubox. Almost all of them were hitting gloves or nothing at all. If judges can't see that they have no right to be judges, because their incompetent. Pacquiao dominated just about every minute of that fight. A blind man could see it. It was a robbery .
I didn't see Manny being slow. I just saw that Bradley was taking some serious shots, but also he was being elusive, so it was difficult for Manny to land multiple punches at one time. Bradley consistantly moved his head. And he never got stuck against the ropes. Bradley has exhibited excellent footwork. Footwork combined with headmovement makes for a difficult target.
cant just stand around for 2 minutes and 30 seconds and expect to win the round with a flurry in the last 30 seconds. Sorry Pac, boring uneventful rounds will be scored weirdly
exactly. Especially with the way fights are scored. If they used the full spectrum of the 10 points, Pacquiao would have clearly won. The 10-9 (unless there are knockdowns or fouls) will always make a fight like this seem closer than it really was.
Commentators say nothing when Bradley lands. They suck dick bigtime. They are a disgrace to boxing for trying to sell to the public that this fight wasnt close. Bradley looked pretty dam good.
What we have are some of the best boxing judges in the sport saying / calling it a very close fight and giving it to Bradley by way of 2-1 split decision. Commentators and media are trying to sell it as a bad decision whereas Pac dominated evry round. Bull****. What it was was a lackluster performance by Pac, whereas as he gave awy the championship rounds and lost. End of story.
effective agression, ring generalship, clean effective punching? is that how you judge a fight, bradley landed 3 meaningful punches...if that
OH ****, Bradley ****ED up Pacquaio's gloves. I think Pacquaio might have taken some good shots on his elbows too. Damn...