Vitali Klitschko is a Coward

People seem to forget that Rahman "earned" his title shot against Vitali by fighting a bunch of low-level tomato cans, and I believe he almost LOST to an ancient Al Cole! It was a joke he was getting a title shot against Vitali, and he would have been KTFO early - far earlier than Danny Williams, btw. :nod

At least Danny Williams - and McCline - have chins. Rahman is, and always has been, a glass-jawed JOKE. Vitali would have annihilated him then, and he would today.

 

Go back to your VB77 confrontation, he's the only one who you have any hope of winning an arguement. I think Bazooka trolls more than Sweet Pea Zelelnoff

 

that's the most intelligent thing you've said all day:good

 

I beg to differ.

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Rahman has accomplished more in the sport than Vitali, Williams and McCline combined??? You've gotta be joking. The ONE thing he did worth mentioning was to knock out Lewis, who was exactly ironed-chinned himself, and who then disposed of the china-chinned Rahman quickly like he should have the first time. That's it. Otherwise he's basically lost against any decent fighter he's ever faced - and some not so decent - often getting knocked into "bolivian." Hardly much to crow about.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

You can't be serious! You're counting Rahman as a "two-time champion" because he was GIVEN a belt he didn't fight for in the ring when Vitali retired. Those fractional belts are about as legitimate as something you'd get out of a Crakker Jack box! Quit grasping at straws.

 

Well by that criteria, Rahman could be more accomplished than Langford, Shavers, Burley, and Willis put together.

But Rahman was/is more accomplished than Vitali.

Sure Vitali probably would have been a favorite over Rahman and probably would have beaten him.

But that's speculation, and Rahman achieved more. At least when he had an underprepared Lewis in front of him, he WON the fight.