Vitali Klitschko vs. Ken Norton

Vitali bounces Norton off the floor like a wrecking ball hitting a scarecrow. Total mismatch.

 

Robots are very predictable. Their responses are pre-programmed and they cannot deviate from the script.

 

This is a joke right??

Vitali inside 3 rounds.

 

Vitali wins by savage beating........

 

Foreman/Tyson win by devastating KOs!!!

 

Funny how your dumb ass finds your way into every Klitschko thread........................

 

Both Foreman & Tyson have been KO'd, Vitali has never even been down in a pro boxing match. Big George's skills were basic at best, Tyson had great combinations & speed but he lacked size and he'd be fighting the tallest fighters he's ever faced and they aren't unskilled giants either.

 

I give Vitali a "B" for effort, but the ONE (1) (UNO) ATG HW champion he faced fukked him up bad, and he loss by TKO. :yep

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Fb0Qidm9Fg"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Fb0Qidm9Fg[/ame]If an overhyped bum like Cooney can do this to Norton, Vitali would kill him!:deal

 

That was brutal. :yikes

 

Vitali's too much for Cooney

 

Cooney vs. Wlad would be an interesting fight.

I think Vitali is the lesser puncher of the two brothers and Norton could set him off and outbox him.

 

Norton was prime from about 73-79
and during this time he got waxed by foreman and shavers now vitali can't hit as hard as them two.

During this time he was outboxed once by ali and once by holmes. Vitali can't box as well as them.

He scored victories over ali (twice) quarry, garcia and young in this time frame. That's a better resume than vitali has.

However norton liked to take rounds off and vitali would punish him under that circumstance. Norton has the speed to slip vitali and he would catch him with the wild right but i'm not sure stylistically he could handle vitali's volume. Byrd showed success but only once vitali had injured his shoulder before the 4th. Very evenly matched fight and would be great to see.

I give norton a very slight edge based on quality of opposition defeated.

 

I didn't know this until now, but you know "Nothing" about boxing!!
Garcia was a super bum who beat the living hell out of Norton and knocked his ass out. Norton did beat an over-the-hill Garcia in a rematch.
But to even call Garcia a good fighter is stupid....

 

When did I call him a good fighter? I listed it because it was avenging a defeat. Just as I list brewster amongst wlad's wins and mccall and rahman amongst lewis's etc etc.

What makes you think garcia was over the hill in the rematch?

Anyways your problem is you're one of the fan boys. Because i'm not a biased poster there are times when my posts go against your idols which is when you call me stupid. Conversely there are times when my posts are in favour of your idols which is when you call me a good poster. I follow the sport not the boxer.

To make it easier just highlight the bits of my post you disagree with and we can debate them :good