Vitali should give up WBC Title

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by madjabber, Jan 10, 2009.

Page 2 of 2
  1. BarryPaul

    BarryPaul New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think he KO's Valuev
     
    BarryPaul, Jan 10, 2009
    #16
  2. bennyj

    bennyj Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,390
    Likes Received:
    2
    ya, vitali or wlad either kos or uds valuev..hes a big garbage truck
     
    bennyj, Jan 10, 2009
    #17
  3. ahmedschachbret

    ahmedschachbret Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, Vitali has to much pride to give back a title with a worthy contender on the table. Gomez and Arena trashtalked Vitali, so he will make them pay for it.
     
    ahmedschachbret, Jan 10, 2009
    #18
  4. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,272
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wlad will fight Haye, and that is the right thing! Because Haye challenges Wlad before Vitali fights Peter.

    Vitali should retire and Gome should figth Arreol and the winner Wlad!
     
    jisi, Jan 10, 2009
    #19
  5. Jack Presscot

    Jack Presscot Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    6,489
    Likes Received:
    1
    Vitali is a paper champion. Wlad is a Titleholder. We have no World Champion at HW.
     
    Jack Presscot, Jan 10, 2009
    #20
  6. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    19,216
    Likes Received:
    2
    Erm, no, it wasn't.
     
    Cobbler, Jan 10, 2009
    #21
  7. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,272
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wlad is World Champion! He boxes his mandatories, unifies and Top Ten Contenders.Wlad had workes hard the last 4 years.

    He deserves the Title "Heavyweight Champion"
     
    jisi, Jan 10, 2009
    #22
  8. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Messages:
    38,466
    Likes Received:
    21
    But he ain't.
     
    catasyou, Jan 10, 2009
    #23
  9. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    Messages:
    13,971
    Likes Received:
    14
    The whole myth of the klitschkos is that they are both champions at the same time, VK is a non entity without the wbc belt. It is a shame the abc orgs have so much say in the heavyweight division but because neither klit wants to become linear it has to be that way!
     
    jc, Jan 10, 2009
    #24
  10. Jack Presscot

    Jack Presscot Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    6,489
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wrong again. Wlad is the IBF Titleholder. He also holds the WBO and the IBO belts. Does he have the RING Championship? Has he unified with Chagaev or his Frankenstein Brother for the WBC Trinket? Nope. Therefore, he is a titleholder like Felix Sturm.
     
    Jack Presscot, Jan 10, 2009
    #25
  11. bennyj

    bennyj Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,390
    Likes Received:
    2
    :patsch Ya...No.. Wladimir is what we call a unified champion with both Wbo and Ibf belt... Im sure you dont REALLY blame wlad that he cant get a fight to add the LOCKBOXED Wba trinket, which he would win anyway..

    So by default, that Wlad would beat the other beltholder anyway , it is pointless to no call Wlad the heavyweight champ..

    Vitali will retire this year probably anyway, allowing Wlad to go ahead and grab the Wbc belt..Then I guess you will be satisfied.Or will people still complain he doesnt have the idiotic Wba belt?
     
    bennyj, Jan 10, 2009
    #26
Page 2 of 2