Vitalis comeback title reign 2008-2012

I thought he was, but hes mistaken, peter wasn't a champion, merely a transient titlist. and he was shyte beyond belief. whats he done since being deemed bad enough for vitali to face? yup, nothing.

so, tko6 is the only real solution, the only top fight vits was in, it seems to bother you and him most.

 

I thought that I was too, but he's so good at putting words in one's mouth that for a moment all I could think about was TKO6 :? I reckon it's some kind of mantra with these chaps :yep

 

If Peter was that shyte, then I'd expect him to have more than just 2 non-Klitschko losses :nono I'd say he's a pretty solid boxer.

 

I got no non Klitschko losses, so am I better than Peter? I might even be able to last more rounds of gass than him.


Its about who he beats, not who he gets repeatedly beat by. And the answer is, his best win is life and death with middleweight james toney.

 

Basically Peter is a fat slob.This fat chicken did nothing remarkable
just proved "waldemar" has a glass-chin.
The quitali-peter was a joke fight.True Peter was 253.5 lbs against
klitschko but minus 60-70 pounds bodyfat.He was incredible slow
and moved in slow motion into the vitali punches.
But i think quitali couldn't knock out or down by power this "fat" Peter by his best punches.Peter was tired by his own lumbering moving and
couldn't continue this boxing comedy and it was a ko win by klit-oris.
What a furious ko win no power/speed/skill etc. just a boring,ridicolous lighter sparring type boxing pantomime.
( Funny when some biased klitschko fans try to sell these pathetic klitschko wins against unskilled, out of shape fat slobs like earthshaking wins.)

 

I think Peter's best win was the the glass-chinned 39 years old
Maskaev.The only reason why Peter has 5 losses because he had only
5 fights against non-bums.His record is garbage his best wins: 39 years old glass-chinned Maskaev and the 38 years old featherfisted Toney.
The fat peter never proved remarkable punching power.

 

Maskaev was 39!!!

OMG I did not know that. Only in the K bro era are such depths sunk to, where nobodies picked past retirement age can win the world title, when in other eras they'd have been poor journeymen.


39!!!! AHaha.

 

A rousing performance by Holyfield.

 

Once again, who are you to say 'all he had to do was survive 3 more rounds?'

Again, if the ringside doctor advised him to quit, and then he had an operation straight afterwards, nobody should have an issue.

At the end of the day, if you've never been in that exact same situation yourself, you can't pass judgement. It's easy for us fans to say what fighters should and shouldn't do, but it's their livelihood at stake.

 

Once again, the only reason that Wlad has cleaned out the division, is because he's remained active, whereas Vitali hasn't. You talk about Wlad as though he was far superior to Vitali. Well, when they were both active, he wasn't.

Again, if Vitali hadn't have had multiple surgeries and he'd have been able to have fought the same amount of times has Wlad has done, we'd now be having a different discussion altogether.

Wlad deserves an awful lot of respect for his longevity and his consistency. But the way you disrespect Vitali is just sad.

 

*cough*

Vitali was almost 38 when he fought Peter after a 4 year layoff.

Vitali was 41 when he defended his title against Charr for the last time

Who's laughing now?

 

I don't believe that mate.

He was back in training camp soon after and back in the ring that same year against Hoffman.

It could have been against Byrd but he wanted no pat of the rematch.

He was stopped on exhaustion from taking body shots and swatting air imo.

 

but why do you enjoy laughing at your own posts? the whole world has been laughing at the awful charr as a credible defence since it happened, so its hilarious you think its some kind of winning stroke.

I see you are using the point of absolute weakness (sam peter) as the main support for your argument. Its an interesting kliturd move, use your greatest weakness against your opponents strength, good one that. Care to explain why you'd deliberately try and get tkoed in such fashion?

you keep on adding the evidence that the K bro reign is a payground for unfit olderguys who would never cut it in other eras.