Wake up: V. Klit is a solid top-10 ATG!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MRBILL, May 30, 2010.


  1. Boggle

    Boggle Grozny State Of Mind Full Member

    48
    24
    Dec 9, 2009
    I humbly apologize for not having a blinding man-love for Vitali Klitschko, one of my favorite active fighters. Ironic, no? Alas, I was foolish to have disagreed with your degree of worship. Have a great day.
     
  2. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    Goddamn right you made a mistake..............:bbb

    V.K. is my current heavyweight God.......

    I also hate / despise bull**** religion, etc... Such hypocritical nonsense......

    MR.BILL:deal
     
  3. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    Very good post:good
     
  4. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    Billl, good job with the sizzling topic. Brothers Klit have been @ the top of the heap for a few years of an uninspired heavyweight division. Not all that impressive till you realize that there are 6.84 billion people on earth these days. Even taking out of the equation: The old and the young, the women and the under 200 lb., honestly, what are the odds that the list of current heavyweight fighters are as bad some think?
     
  5. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    I can dig that rap, bro....... V.K. is the goods....... He is........

    V.K. is a physically fit 247 lb. monster of a mother who can, and does, reek havoc on his foe's..... What more does 2010 want???

    Pushing age 39, V.K. offers more than 99% of all the ex-heavyweight greats ever excercised in the ring........ WTF????

    For all the haters / skeptics, V.K. is in great shape that appears natural in build to me here in '10............ No steroids..... Well, not in last 7 to 10 yrs anyway..... NO!!

    MR.BILL:deal:thumbsup
     
  6. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    Based on what :huh

    Foreman won the title again when he was 5 years older, Lewis beat prime VITLAY when he was pushing 38....VITLAY is just beating up on bums for Gods sake :patsch
     
  7. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    What the Jesus Christ? I respect a 1994 version of Michael Moorer, but is he any better or even tougher than "Peter, Gomez, Arreola, Johnson or Al Sosnowski?"
    :huh

    MR.BILL:bbb
     
  8. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Well, I've only said about five times now that I'm purely talking head to head, and Vitali doesn't crack the top 10 for greatness.

    Let's run your examples for how effective Louis was through a relentlessly negative filter.

    How many others stopped Cris Arreola, Sam Peter, Kirk Johnson or Larry Donald? None. If Louis gets any credit at all for stopping 180 pound, 4x defeated Pastor, then why the **** does Vitali not get any credit for not losing a single round while stopping top contenders Arreola, Peter and Johnson?

    And Conn may have been an ATG, but he weighed in at 174 pounds. Michael Spinks was more of an ATG and weighed in at 212 pounds, he got steamrolled in 90 seconds by Tyson, while Louis lost a wide UD by today's rules. Can you honestly see Billy Conn winning a 30 second stretch of the fight against Vitali?

    Right, time for more hating.

    So Louis got this journeyman badly hurt on more than one occasion, and couldn't get him out of there. I think I'll mark him down for that, since Vitali gets marked down for stopping guys late rather than early.

    When he fought Louis the first time, he was coming straight off a loss against 15-11 Jim Thompson. He had also already lost to:

    28-7 Eddie Blunt,
    28-9, 195 pound Willie Reddish,
    9-3, 196 pound Lem Franklin,
    13-4 Al Bray
    Buddy Baer
    and 7-0 Lou Nova.

    Be honest with me. How much credit do you give Vitali for winning every round against Abe Simon and stopping him late? No credit at all, is my guess.

    Being that Chris Byrd handled David Tua's power easily and never looked troubled, yes I do think he has enough of a beard to compete against Louis. Byrd is very skillful and if little Billy Conn can be miles ahead after 12 rounds then I don't see any reason at all why Chris Byrd couldn't.

    His work ethic and willingness to take on all comers are every bit as good as Louis. And most of the bum of the month club would hardly lay a glove on him.

    You referred to beating George Foreman while past-prime on foreign ground. Which fight were you referring to if not Ali?

    And yes, I think a 32 year old Vitali matches up very well against Foreman. He's bigger. He won't be scared of Foreman like many opponents were. He has a better chin. Foreman's crude slugging will be hard pressed to find Vitali's chin anyway. And if he wins the first three rounds, it's all but over. Foreman was not adaptable, not particularly skilful, and wouldn't have the physical advantages that he generally enjoyed.

    And yes, I think he beats FOTC Frazier. Why is this so ludicrous an idea? Frazier had Ali's number stylistically, but aside from that, do you see Vitali doing any worse against Foreman? He couldn't really. Do you see Vitali going life and death with Oscar Bonavena? Really?

    Facing Ali isn't the same as fighting Vitali. And just because Ali is much, much greater doesn't mean that Frazier would find him much, much more difficult to beat. Not at all. Frazier took a beating in basically every one of his fights. Sometimes too much of a beating for him to take. The difference against Vitali is, he's going to find himself eating more than usual, and landing less than usual.

    Take Ali away and Frazier doesn't make it anywhere near the top 20. Without Ali he has no significant wins, and he was crushed in his prime worse than any other ATG. (Granted, against an ATG opponent.)

    Take away Ali from Frazier's record, and it immediately plummets to Vitali level, except Frazier didn't win the rest of his fights anywhere near as convincingly, in fact he struggled mightily with some average opposition. Not only that, but in matchups with other ATGs he is at major physical disadvantages, as compared to Vitali's undeniable physical advantages.

    Remove the 3 Ali fights and then look at Frazier's career record. There is NO WAY that you or anyone else here would even SERIOUSLY CONSIDER that he might be able to COMPETE WITH, let alone BEAT, an undefeated prime Ali. You would look at his record and say, "He went life and death with some nobodies and then was utterly destroyed in two rounds by the only great fighter he ever met."

    And yet when he got a shot at THE ATG, he beat him.

    Why is it such a stupid, unthinkable idea that Vitali the hardworking giant might actually be able to hang with these guys as well?

    :hat
     
  9. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    I would honestly say he is. vitali only looks so good based on his opponents he's fighting... this division sucks.
     
  10. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    He beat a prime Evander Holyfield, so yes he is better than all those guys you mentioned, none of whom have a win like that on their record.
     
  11. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    Blah Blah Blah.....you really do talk bollocks...especially at this time of night.
     
  12. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    Christ on a Friday................ Joe Louis made 25 title defenses from 1937 to 1948 and, 75% of them challengers were either bums or stiffs, even by 1940s standards...... No ****, Jack........ BUT! All the ball-lickers just line-up and suck off Louis' ass..... WHY?

    MR.BILL
     
  13. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    1) Wow, that sure deconstructed my points. Way to convince me that I am wrong and you are correct.

    2) It's 2 o' clock in the afternoon here, moron.

    3) I wasn't speaking to you to begin with. **** off.

    :hat
     
  14. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    Granted, I too always felt Moorer was technically sound when in-shape..... WORD!! He often gets a bad rap sheet from many posters....... Why? Cuz he was chinny and a wee bit lazy in training...... Otherwise, Moorer was world class in the ring......

    I also think Moorer got a lucky decision over Holy in 1994...... Moorer may've won on points, but he needed to be pushed hard by Atlas on that night................. HONESTLY! I felt Holy could've gotten a draw back in April of 1994.... Holy proved gallant in fighting injured....

    MR.BILL
     
  15. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    Nice work, moron....now move along.

    I really could tear all your points to pieces but I prefer to just laugh at them, you know nothing my friend. :lol::lol::lol:

    Feel free to post bile whilst I'm sleeping though, it'll amuse me when I wake up.

    PS - Go **** your mother, Klit-ite :yep