Roy had Kovalev winning the fight, how was he sucking Ward's D exactly? LOL, how many times did he say what a right hand by Kovalev, and praise his punches landed? He was unbiased.
It's not about what he said about Kovalev, its what he was saying about Ward at certain times. Roy has the tendency to give praise to fighters he likes at the wrong times, which is how you know he is biased. Again just look the freaking Hooker fight before. Perez was out boxing the **** outta hooker, yet Roy still maintained that Hooker was more skilled it was just that Perez had better timing? WTF??? Even Lampley (who I agree is also bias) caught him on this and told him timing was part of skill, and Roy just went on some nonsense rant that he eventually dropped. Go back and look it up. Not saying Roy ain't good, I like him. But its clear when he sometimes favors, or at least overly praises a fighter more than he should beat that particular time.
Did you even read what the man wrote? Roy had Kovalev winning.....I mean how much biased can a man be?
Again what does him having Kovalev winning have to do with him being biased or not? What just because he agrees with the majority consensus that negates the bias said during the fight? Again just look 40min before at the Hooker fight.
the Floyd path , ward will be there showing his superior holding and throwing about whilst moving his head back and fourth you just wait and see
I thought Ward edged it but by the narrowest of margins. Ward took over toward the end and Kovalev seemed to tire and didn't impose himself enough post knockdown. I didn't think it was as good a fight as most people thought.
You probably missed the knockdown as well. Still as I am aware (expert), an "ex" is a has been and a "spurt" is a drip under pressure. Sums it up nicely