Was it better in the old school boxing days?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by baconmaker, Jan 23, 2015.

  1. baconmaker

    baconmaker Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2013
    Messages:
    3,222
    Likes Received:
    728
    The old timers who boxed back in the days 30s and 40s, was the boxing culture far more better than nowdays? No internet, or any poisoning mobile phones. Training and exercising, working in field was the only thing they did. Rocky Marciano ran 7-10 miles every morning and walked 10-15 miles later in the day. Many fighters also conditioned themselves with woodcutting or using woods as weightlifting. Also losing a fight wasn't that big deal, there were many great boxers who had "50-20" record and still fought world title fights. Nowdays its build 32-0 record fighting journeymen and get payday.

    Boxing is always poor men and gentleman sport, but it feels its going to change to other route. Modern training methods and drugs are changing every sports.
     
  2. rapscalion

    rapscalion Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,849
    Likes Received:
    761
    Hell yes it was
     
  3. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    38,568
    Likes Received:
    8,129
    Yes, it was more pure.
     
  4. Heavy Handed

    Heavy Handed I keep planets in orbit Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,461
    Likes Received:
    12
    Yes it was. Boxing was the most popular sport in the US, alongside baseball.
     
  5. bigbeatbaby

    bigbeatbaby Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2012
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    1
    If only there was HD tv back in the day
     
  6. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    42,080
    Likes Received:
    3,672
    Overall, it was just a bigger sport in the states. More participation, more fights, 2 recognized titles (and one guy usually had both titles) instead of 4+, less divisions.

    On the downside, it's not like you would be able to see all the good fights like you can now with TV.

    It was sleazy as hell then too.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    114,866
    Likes Received:
    51,990
    Not for the fighters. Less money for a dangerous amount of fighting. Sparring more than is good for their brains. No proper medical protection at ringside a lot of times. And for some of the great black fighters it was a walking nightmare of injustice.

    But it's pretty awesome that you could have a world-class fight broadcast on a Wednesday night on free-to-air television in the States, yeah.
     
  8. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    94,689
    Likes Received:
    29,602
    People back then walked around in greyscale, and had touch jobs next to their boxing careers. They couldn't train months for one fight because they fought multiple times in a single month.
    Real men, serious boks.
     
  9. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    13,749
    Likes Received:
    1,240
    The only real difference was there was no doping or steroids. There was, but cannot be compared to today. Other than that, it's overrated nostalgia.
     
  10. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    16,591
    Likes Received:
    256
    At the end of the day, a good fight is a good fight.

    I'd take the Toney - Jirov fight over most of the fights in the 30-60's. Same can be said about Foreman-Lyle, I'd pick that fight over most fights either held today or 75 years ago. Gatti-Ward the same and on it goes.
     
  11. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    11,930
    Likes Received:
    4,692
  12. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    38,688
    Likes Received:
    13,506
    The pace and number of fights per year in the seventies (five to ten for major fighters was common) was reasonable, a compromise from earlier days and the current 1-3 defences /yr


    Yep.

    I remember Harry Carpenter embarrassing himself somewhat by being very surprised at the decision in Ali-Norton 1 which was broadcast live and free (except for the TV license fee:D) on BBC.