Was Sam Langford the most complete heavyweight ever?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Sep 23, 2012.

  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,007
    Think about it.

    He basically had everything.

    He could out box the best boxers, and out punch the best punchers.

    He was an all time great finisher.

    He had excellent mobility.

    His chin was like an anvil

    His ring intelligence was through the roof.

    His only, repeat only weakness, was the fact that he was 5’ 6’’

    If he had been born 6 feet tall, but otherwise had the same characteristics, he would have been virtually unbeatable. Then again, perhaps his short stature forced him to become such a perfect fighter.

    Either way, he is about as close as we have ever come to the complete heavyweight fighter.
     
  2. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    10,047
    Likes Received:
    2,856
    Joe Louis. He also got outboxed thoroughly by the best defensive boxer for his time and years to come in Jack Johnson.
     
  3. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    8,850
    Likes Received:
    246
    The height ruins it. He was exceptionally skilled and talented but I can't get past the height.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,007
     
  5. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,432
    Likes Received:
    33
    if you had said most complete fighter period, i might have to say yes. but oddly, at heavyweight his weaknesses (ie: size and RELATIVE vulnerability) were at their most salient. at 150-180, he was invincible and may not have lost to any fighter in history...even greb. but past 180, he could be knocked out and was beat by fighters whose biggest (and only) advantage was often size.

    i can't ignore this: he wasn't complete at heavyweight. he was a middleweight competing far above his weight class whose size allowed lesser fighters to outbox or knock him out, even around his prime.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,236
    Louis for me. You mention his weakness for adapting, the truth is his style always paid off in the end as noone could handle his educated pressure behind the jab over 15 rounds.

    The only man i'd pick to beat Louis is Ali and that's because Ali is too quick and wouldn't get knocked out.

    Langford is exceptional stylistically speaking but due to his height I think a great jabber with a solid chin will always be favoured to beat him.

    Give him another 8 inches in height and a pinpoint jab and i'd probably agree with you.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,007
     
  8. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,432
    Likes Received:
    33
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,007
     
  10. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    8,850
    Likes Received:
    246
    Well how many heavyweights were one flaw away from being invincible? If Ali could.punch hard he would've been unstoppable? Who's beating an iron chinned Lennox Lewis? A 6'3" Marciano or Tyson? If a young Foreman was a 15 round fighter how long until someone beat him? Or a quick Liston? Complete means Jofre or Robinson or Leonard who almost literally had everything you want.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,236
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,007
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,007
    End thread!
     
  14. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,005
    Likes Received:
    2,258
    i don't think you can call any small guy the most complete hw ever. i love guys who overcome limits but those limits still exist.
     
  15. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,847
    Likes Received:
    10,054
    I think he was the best pound for pound fighter ever but not the most complete heavyweight ever because of his size ... he really wasn't even a heavyweight ...