Was Taylor-Pavlik 2 controversial?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MrStayman, Jun 20, 2008.


  1. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Problem with those "flashy combinations" he was pulling his punches to make them. Yeah, you can throw more and faster if you don't sit down on the punches. That is why he was winning the first boxing match but losing the fight. The judges in the first fight bought that crap and had him ahead, but the accumulation had him done in by the beginning of the 6th.
     
  2. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    ok i can respect your opinon. but rdas 2-7 i feel you have a soft spott for taylor in your heart:yep
     
  3. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    your spott on hermit:good
     
  4. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    7-5 Pavlik. Some rounds were close, but I like Pavlik's busy output over Taylor's light punchings. Also damage has to play some part in the scoring, and at fight's end, Taylor's face was swell, and Pavlik's face was unmark. Kelly landed the harder punchers, and control the pace of the fight. I dont think last round flurrys or looking flashing should play a part in the scoring.
     
  5. jaco

    jaco Thomas Hearns Full Member

    2,000
    1
    Sep 16, 2007
    7-5 Pavlik. It was a close fight up untill the last few rounds in which Pavlik took control. Like some have said It was not nearly as entertaining a the first fight.
     
  6. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    it was even...any decision could be controversial
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    What people? It was a clear win for Pavlik.
     
  8. JETSKI

    JETSKI Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,758
    38
    Aug 26, 2004
    Perfectly stated...5 rounds apiece after 10. KP stepped on it in the last 2 & JT started to gas. Kellys 1st time going 12. He did fine, but he himseld admitted that he didn't seem right out there. Must have been that strange couch he slept on in Vegas.
     
  9. MasterFlo

    MasterFlo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,073
    2
    Dec 11, 2007
    I thought it was 8 to 4 Pavlik, so many of Taylor's punches were fully or partially blocked and Kelly controlled the middle of the ring. Alot of people cheer and get swayed when someone throws wide aggressive shots whether they land or not.
     
  10. Samurai

    Samurai I lost an avatar bet Full Member

    3,634
    4
    Mar 30, 2008
    I had it 7-5 Pavlik.

    Dead even after 10, but KP finished stronger whereas Taylor looked a bit faded.
     
  11. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    It was a close fight that could have gone to either man....no arguement from me if someone wants to say either won...just if anyone is saying it was a robbery, they are idiots.
     
  12. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    :good
     
  13. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    The judges scores were 116-112, 115-113, and 117-111. I had it 116-112. On fight night I thought 117-111 was to wide. After re-watching it a couple times I thought 116-112 or 117-111 was the right score.
     
  14. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pavlik won that fight, no doubt about it.
     
  15. MrStayman

    MrStayman Active Member Full Member

    1,180
    0
    Jun 2, 2007
    Fair enough