Was Tyson Fury ever any good?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tragedy, Dec 22, 2024.


  1. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,817
    23,693
    Feb 19, 2007
    i made some points, those arent delusions. i dont think it was good enough to be an average win. the prize was ridiculously big for the effort.
     
  2. Dempsey Gibbons

    Dempsey Gibbons Member Full Member

    388
    447
    Jun 25, 2005
    Yes, Usyk's age is a factor but I consider him toward the end of his prime more than past prime. Fury is a very good fighter and I feel some people are dismissing it because of Fury's past nonsensical claims to being the best ever that would beat all the best fighters from the past.
     
  3. Dannymita

    Dannymita Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,874
    9,522
    Jan 21, 2019
    Honestly..I'll be the first to admit this post is slightly unfair...but i think he benefits massively from Fighting in a **** era ...dont get me wrong..fury is great and usyk is elite ...but I dont think they fair as well in the 90s heavyweight era...wilder and aj being in the top 5 for so long says alot about the state of heavyweight..still..least its better than the wlad and ibragimov era
     
  4. Matt0029

    Matt0029 Member Full Member

    261
    174
    May 29, 2017
    I think Fury would of lost to Haye in 2013. Haye was a beast back then. The over hand that Usky was catching Fury with could of been Haye. He wouldn't stay up of Hayes and was a great finisher back then
     
    tragedy likes this.
  5. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,407
    423
    Aug 23, 2010
    Good fighter. He isn’t as good as we thought though. A big reason why he was favored over Usyk was his size advantage. If you are 6 inches taller with a 6 inch reach advantage and a 55 pound weight advantage and you lose, you were never great. That’s too many advantages for you to lose twice to a much smaller man. Good fighter. One of the best heavyweights of his era but not great.
     
    highlander and Csonnyliston like this.
  6. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,871
    3,023
    Dec 11, 2009
    Why?
    I don't think he is the best ever or even the best of this era but can't see why he wouldn't be talked about in the list of top HWs and ATGs
    He won British, Commonwealth and European HW titles
    Also
    He won WBA, WBC, WBO, IBF, Ring HW titles
    He also beat 2 reigning champions
     
  7. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,236
    38,462
    Jan 22, 2015
    He was a good fighter, had some good wins, but Usyk is a great fighter. There's a difference.
     
    Rexrapper 1 and Csonnyliston like this.
  8. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,310
    1,817
    Nov 11, 2006
    Nah he was never any good, to be honest, the only reason last nights fight was any good is because he was allowed to have a beard and wear his trunks high…. If it wasn’t for those, Usyk would have KO’d him in the first 13 seconds.

    I’m surprised we haven’t seen more beard sporting, high trunk wearing champions, honestly, with the kind of advantages these things provide.
     
  9. tragedy

    tragedy Active Member Full Member

    851
    586
    Mar 18, 2024
    cope
     
  10. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,602
    4,236
    Dec 5, 2010
    He was always better than Wilder and Joshua, and he has shown that. He was the best HW on the scene for long spells. In short, he was very, very good.

    While it's possible that the mythical prime version from Wilder II could break Usyk down and stop him, or the slim Klitschko version could outpoint Usyk, it didn't happen.
     
    MagnificentMatt likes this.
  11. edabomb

    edabomb Active Member Full Member

    977
    948
    Jul 2, 2011
    This is the risk that this generation have run by not fighting each other in their primes. There's an easy argument that the likes of Fury and AJ only ever fought journeymen or elite fighters well past their best. Neither will finish their careers in the top 10-15 heavyweights of all time.
     
  12. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,310
    1,817
    Nov 11, 2006
    You got me…

    What does a win over a “never any good” Tyson Fury do for Usyks legacy?

    It amazes me at the lack of logic (downplaying Usyks best opponents while calling him a top ATG), and clear lack of experience or true understanding of combat sports by so many on this forum. No one who’s felt a punch in their life would say stupid **** like a beard is going to help someone’s chin….
     
  13. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,817
    23,693
    Feb 19, 2007
    yeah, that showing he was better than aj thing, didnt happen either.
     
  14. tragedy

    tragedy Active Member Full Member

    851
    586
    Mar 18, 2024
    It makes Usyk "The Middleweight" the Heavyweight king of the modern era, which arguably puts him in the discussion for best ever, but only for the sake of argument, not definitively.