he was a boy at the time! look at his physical development and his opponents. of course he can be beaten and has been- but as a professional - he has not-. his style- is exceptional. and it will take a special fighter to beat him- or an unfairly large one.
hmm says Why the hell? It dont matter if I did or not... it just shows he can be beaten.. I'm not questioning whether he got robbed or whatever cause I rarely dispute the ruling of judges and it will be a waste of time since it was already protested and failed.. I'm simply knocking the notion that some label him as the "perfect" fighter. Perfect record or not! Beside it was a split decision, one of few he has encountered... some questionable. Not once did I mentioned about him being robbed for this fight... read my post carefullyatsch
less then stellar ?! At his age at the time to win 3 national champion ships in 3 different weight classes atsch how is 84-6 less then stellar???atsch
Ok I admit my bad on that part.. I should've wrote more clearly and used a better word. Not perfect is what I meant as being less than stellar since he keeps bragging about his perfect pro record...It's just that you only hear about his accomplishments. It was a successful amateur career none the less but less than stellar compared to his pro. Get it?
Haha, good lord man, its not too hard to tell you have much hate for Floyd Jr. Are you seriously saying, that because a fighter was defeated a decade ago that it makes them less than stellar now. So I guess there is no such thing as improvement or learning from mistakes then. The worse thing is is that the evidence you're using to support your evidence is flawed as its plain to see from the clip that Floyd was tagging that guy left right and center. Yeh, anybody can lose on any given day but that boy in the clip grew into a man that is less likely to suffer a defeat than any other fighter out there. And unfortunately due to money at stake and such, how many fighters these days are likely to rack up 200+ bouts.
For crying out loud I already explained myself above and what evidence to support another evidence are you talking about?. Fool I was comparing his amateur and pro records and saying this man can be beat and implying his pro career as the better! Did I say he is not stellar NOW because of his amateur career? I merely said HE CAN BE BEATEN!atsch Omg, of course he has improved since then and so have the competition (he's not the only one)..That's why I stated "STYLES MAKE FIGHTS"..... Do you need for me to state the obvious to you? It's clear you're a diehard PBF fan... if not... then DON'T make ASSumptions I'm a hater as well. To assume is to PRESUME too early and to make yourself into an ASS.