What if nacho trains pac?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mad_takamura, Apr 21, 2008.


  1. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Not hard at all.
    All you have to do is judge the fight on a round by round basis, as a judge should do.

    You take away that 3rd round knockdown, the best the dishonest judges would have had was a bogus draw for JMM.

    So your theory that avoiding getting dropped is the key for a JMM victory does'nt hold water when we're talking about dishonest judging!

    Joe Calzaghe got dropped in the 1st round by Bernard Hopkins, yet honesty won the night!:deal

    Had that been Pac instead of Bernard Hopkins in against Calzaghe, I have no doubt that dishonesty would have won the night!;)
     
  2. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    i know, but thats how it will always be if the fight is too close to call. maybe if JMM looked dominant the whole fight then they could give it to him. Problem is, he didnt.
     
  3. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    i honestly don't think it will be a great fit. i firmly believe that roach is the best possbile trainer for pac. bar none
     
  4. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    huh? Joe was the agressor in that fight as it was PAC in his fight with JMM...BHOP was landing clear shots but it was the agression of Joe that gave him the win. like i said, JMM got KD'd, yes he recovered, but still he didnt dominate like how joe did after he was dropped. its different.
     
  5. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    In other words you're telling me JMM has to completely dominate the fight from start to finish without any lapses what so ever.....
    .....then maybe JMM can have a chance to win a close decision, even though the scores would still be bogus!


    Please dont get me started boxbox, this topic has been debated, there is'nt really a need to do it again.
    ....so dont get me started!:twisted: :fire :lol: :lol: :D :nut ;)
     
  6. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    hahaha! sorry pal, didnt mean to get you excited, i know it has been debated many times and you've posted you epics over and over again (trust me i'd hate to read it again) ok can we just say "its still an unfinished business" then?:good
     
  7. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Whats so different about it....if anything JMM clearly dominated Pac by clearly and efficiently landing thudding shots on a consistent basis.
    Something Calzaghe was never able to do against Hopkins, though Hopkins did'nt do it either.

    You Pac fans should be a little more consistent with your approach to analyzing a fight.....
    ....you should be saying, Bernard Hopkins clearly won a close fight, Joe Calzaghe kissed canvas!:lol: :lol: :rofl :rofl :yep ;)














    I mean it, but I'm teasing you just the same!:D ;)
     
  8. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Nacho Beristein agree with you. He said before the JMM-Pac rematch that he had great respect for Roach and Pac as a team, and that they worked great together.
     
  9. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    of course he would. i speak the truth:good