what made lennox lewis so great

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Benjiabc, Jun 10, 2008.


  1. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    A bit too high, you honestly would pick Lewis over guys like Marciano/Dempsey/Holmes/Foreman and many others deserving that spot? :huh
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,790
    51,803
    Mar 21, 2007
    Sure. Why are the men you've named more deserving? I try to build composite lists, so this is taking into account h2h, skillset, resume, achievment, I'm absolutley confident that Lewis can be said to belong there.

    I've already outlined why at the bottom of page one of this thread.
     
  3. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    I'll check it out. :good
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,790
    51,803
    Mar 21, 2007
    So you are saying that in the last 40 years boxers have got faster?

    I disagree that Tyson was more skilled. There was very little in it, Liston is certainly technically superior, though Tyson is the better composite puncher.

    He isn't more skilled. I think you've only seen Liston fight Ali, that's what I think. Liston is better balanced, has a better jab, has a better chin, has better stamina. For starters.

    :huh

    How else should greatness be measured?

    Do you think there were more or less proffesional fighters in the United States in 1940 or 2008?

    Uh-huh.


    I agree with all of this.
     
  5. Steve Fox

    Steve Fox Guest

    He rarely gave an opponent a chance that they didn't all ready have.

    He had an arsenal of punches and a great tactical brain.

    Most importantly, he had the desire to prove that he was the best, not just to others, but to himself; he didn't just want to be popularly thought of as the best, by way of being in the right place at the right time; he wanted to completely undermine any credible argument against his status.
     
  6. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006
    Don't forget the overhand right or the uppercut :good
     
  7. Bomber

    Bomber Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,526
    0
    Jan 9, 2008
    What made lennox lewis so great?

    Beating every fighter he fought in a 40 plus fight career. That goes a long way to help.
     
  8. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    yup great overhand right

    :good
     
  9. coog

    coog Active Member Full Member

    1,409
    22
    Feb 24, 2008
    He had it all size speed power, skills, inteligence some one added that he could fight backing up under pressure. Lewis may have beaten every heavyweight in history, does that make him the best?
     
  10. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    id like to hear the argument that puts Dempsey ahead of Lennox...

    Lewis was a tremendous heavyweight, truly an ATG, he had great jab, uppercut and over hand right, one of the biggest hitters in the divisions history, and could follow a game plan perfect.

    He wasnt one dimensional like many other good heavys, for example his performances against the likes of Golota and Grant were different to his displays against Tua and Holyfield. he was Champion of a good era aswel, Ruddock, Bruno, Morrison, Mercer, Briggs, Holyfield, Golota, Grant, ol' Mike, even Rahman and McCall are world class heavyweights, if the haters admit it or not. he also got the win against Vitali Klitschko.

    He avenged his losses, so beat every man they put in front of him and retired undisputed champion. Legend.

    The only name really missing on Lennox's record is Riddick Bowe, but that was no fault of Lewis'.
     
  11. 1stcontact

    1stcontact Like Mo, But Better Full Member

    1,797
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    :bbb:good:thumbsup:deal
     
  12. Feiti

    Feiti Active Member Full Member

    1,312
    0
    Jul 31, 2004
    1) Not all of them but I do think the training methods and such have improved (I think around the 60s there was a general improvement that started in boxers) Really big fighters have definitely gotten faster. Bowe and Lewis were the first 6'5 ish fighters to be truly top notch (not slow and clumsy like Carnera) and now we are seeing fighters who are 6'6-6'8, like the Klitschkos becoming top notch. Hell Valuev is even pretty decent and he´s 7 foot.

    2-3) I disagree although I´ll try to watch more Liston fights to get a better perspective.

    4) It should not be measured any differently but you´re spinning the topic. The topic was who would win a H2H fight. That is not measured by greatness but by your pure ability to beat your opponent.

    5) I would have to guess there are more full time professional fighters, who have optimal training facilities now than back then. As for the number of professional fighters period, I would also guess there are more of the now than then.
     
  13. dave82

    dave82 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    it was the right punch at the right time.
     
  14. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Lewis makes my top 10 heavyweights and ranks very highly H2H because of his physical stature, powerful right hand, jab and boxing ability.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,790
    51,803
    Mar 21, 2007
    I don't think a very serious one can be made.