when did PBF RUN from DLH? i must've missed it!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jinx, Aug 10, 2007.


  1. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,558
    18,245
    Oct 7, 2006
    Dude, the video that summurizes the fight is right there. Show me a video of that fight that shows something else.
     
  2. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    You can sure bud all you like, spin all you like, sit here and complain all you like.

    The majority had PBF winning, the record books have him winning, landing more punches and a higher connect rate.

    I had it 8-4, many had it 8-4 or 7-5. I am not going to argue your opinion, because no matter what I say, factual or not, you will argue your opinion, which you cannot prove and is a waste of time trying to change.

    BTW, DLH himself said PBF was very fast and faster than he thought.

    9 min video of a 36 minute fight certainly doesn't even tell half the story now does it.
     
  3. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    :rofl....ever heard of objectivity?

    I could cut and paste a video of mab-pac that shows mab dominating if i had the time and obsession of the maker of that video
     
  4. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,558
    18,245
    Oct 7, 2006
    That video is not biased at all. It's the fight in a nut shell. It shows the HIGHLIGHTS of the fight, nothing less nothing more. That is the fight in a nutshell, accept it and don't be in denial. I know you're Rican but it doesn't mean that you have to be biased against DLH.
     
  5. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    I have seen better spin jobs than this.

    The video shows the highlights the maker wants you to see.

    Accept the outcome, move on.
     
  6. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Scorecards:

    AP - 116-112
    ESPN- 116-112
     
  7. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,558
    18,245
    Oct 7, 2006
    Oh I've moved on. It's Jinx and his crew who haven't.

    It's funny how PBF was barely able to get a SD against Old Man De La Hoya, who was slower, less skilled, and way out of prime according the the Joy crew.

    But the reality is that this video not made by me is a summary of the actual fight.
     
  8. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    :rofl....i have a tremendous respect for DLH, and anyone with eyes and without his dick in his mouth saw that DLH didnt win, and that ANY respectable judge could give the fight to DLH to make a split decision was the real injustice.
     
  9. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Reality was just posted by someone else.

    Reality is DLH lost.
     
  10. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,558
    18,245
    Oct 7, 2006
    So I take it you take whatever those media outlets say as doctrine?:yep
     
  11. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    As opposed to youtube highlights made by a fan of the fighter who lost?:lol:
     
  12. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,576
    11,621
    Jan 6, 2007
    As I said, I'm ok with the decision.

    Good fight, fair result.
     
  13. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,558
    18,245
    Oct 7, 2006
    Sure he lost. And Pernell WHitaker drew with JCC, Quartey lost to Forrest and DLH lost to Trinidad.:smooch
     
  14. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Difference in those?

    Majority of fans thought there was a different outcome than the judges:deal
    So did many media outlets.

    Not the case here is it. You can do better than that.
     
  15. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,558
    18,245
    Oct 7, 2006
    Buddy you still have the Trinidumb syndrome, that is why YOU can't see objectively.