Which card makes the most money?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Walter Sobchak, Jun 2, 2016.

  1. Walter Sobchak

    Walter Sobchak Spinal! Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    472
    At Wembley Stadium
    Joshua vs Fury
    Bellew vs Haye
    Callum Smith vs Degale
    Brook vs Khan
    Flanagan vs Crolla

    In Vegas
    Wilder vs Ortiz
    Ward v Kovalev
    Canelo vs GGG
    Thurman vs Spence
    Postol vs Crawford

    Overall money gained from all sources - which card rakes in the most?
     
  2. billo_billy

    billo_billy Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2015
    Messages:
    1,675
    Likes Received:
    57
    GGG vs Canelo by a mile. The TV money from that fight will be ridiculous
     
  3. Mark McBurney

    Mark McBurney Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    50
    Probably not a huge difference but Vegas by a nose purely down to Canelo/GGG. If it was Canelo v A.N.Other, Wembley would beat it by a mile.
     
  4. Mark McBurney

    Mark McBurney Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    50
    Not many of the other fighters on that Vegas bill will sell many PPV's alone though, the Wembley one would do very well at the box office IMO.
     
  5. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2014
    Messages:
    16,188
    Likes Received:
    13,233
    Globally? The Vegas one, easily
     
  6. thornpipe

    thornpipe Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    903
    Likes Received:
    95
    If the UK had the same population as the US then Wembley card would win but purely because their is more people in the US the Vegas card wins. Wembley card is better though.
     
  7. Walter Sobchak

    Walter Sobchak Spinal! Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    472
    I don't think theres much in it. Canelo swings it but the UK is a goldmine at the moment and the casuals would go mental for the Haye and Joshua/Fury fights, nevermind Brook etc.

    You could probably charge a record PPV fee and sell out wembley with record prices etc.

    GGG, Thurman, Spence, Wilder, Ward, etc etc dont generate half as much as AJ.
     
  8. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    14,883
    Likes Received:
    10,944
    Id honestly pay 100 pound for either of them cards on ppv, there has never been a nighybof boxing like that. Will never happen though , Joshua vs fury would sell out Wembley on its own, you would never see a stacked card like that

    However if you wanted to elevate British boxing to a new level it would be the card to do it
     
  9. thornpipe

    thornpipe Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    903
    Likes Received:
    95
    The purse for the UK card would cost over £100m.
    Sell out Wembley average ticket cost £125 gets you £11m.
    2m buys at £60 each gets you £120m
    Sponcers in at £10m
    Give it to network for free and tell them your keeping all PPV money and they make their money on adverts between rounds.
    But no one will pay that in the uk
     
  10. Mark McBurney

    Mark McBurney Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    50
    £10m EACH?!? No chance. Half that and you'd get change. Do you honestly think Bellew, Smith, Degale, Flanagan and Crolla would get anything like half of that?!! No way. Regardless those massive purses will be based on a PPV share so not as risky as you suggest for a promoter.

    I believe people would pay £60 for that card, too.
     
  11. thornpipe

    thornpipe Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    903
    Likes Received:
    95
    Joshua vs Fury - £40m
    Bellew vs Haye - £5m
    Callum Smith vs Degale - £10m
    Brook vs Khan - £25m
    Flanagan vs Crolla - £5m

    How's that sound?
     
  12. Mark McBurney

    Mark McBurney Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    50
    Unrealistic, IMO.

    There's no way Joshua and Fury would demand a £40m split purse, nor Brook and Khan £25m. Froch and Groves only shared £10m!
     
  13. kevinreid001

    kevinreid001 Punchdrunk101 Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2012
    Messages:
    2,844
    Likes Received:
    968
    Joshua fury 20 mil
    Bellew. Haye 7 mil
    Smith degale 5mil
    Brook Khan 12 mil
    Flanagan Crolla 3 mil

    That many ppl in early prob wouldn't last till main event. 🍻😜
     
  14. thornpipe

    thornpipe Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    903
    Likes Received:
    95
    Tyson Lewis fight was worth 50m back them survey this has to be worth 40m fury is loved in US and AJ starting to make a name for himself over their.
    As for brook khan, Eddie offerd khan 10m for fight so give Keller 15m cos he's champ
     
  15. Mark McBurney

    Mark McBurney Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    50
    Tyson v Lewis was incomparable then to Fury v Joshua now. Fury isn't anything like as popular in the US, and Joshua is still largely unknown. Tyson was/is thought of as one of, if not the, best heavyweights of all time, as was/is Lewis and Lewis held all the belts that mattered at the time. It's not even close to comparing like for like.

    This is a smaller fight at present than Froch v Groves 2.