which fight is more of a robbery to you?

Not looking to the compubox numbers, but the "who won wich round" factor (wich is the way fights are scored) then Joe vs B-Hop wasn't and JMM vs Pac was a robbery.

There's a problem with the way rounds are scored in boxing, I think anyone agrees with that.
Look at it the the tennis way, wich has a similar system. I believe it was a match between the two Germans Becker and Stich wich ended in 6-0/6-7/6-0/6-7/6-7 (or something simular)... the guy with 3 times 6-7 won the match, while he was the lesser player and clearly made less points as his opponent. But in sets it was still 3-2 so he won, no discussion possible.
In boxing you can win 5 rounds clearly and still (rightfully) lose on the cards.

 

Hopkins pulled his whiny little ***** moves and lost that fight clearly

Marquez fought like a true warrior and beat Pac

 

Hopkins knocked Calzaghe over. Marquez didn't hurt or have Pacquaio in trouble once.

 

Neither. Calzaghe and Pacquiao both won, fairly.

 

CALZAGHE did beat that black ass convincingly.. PACMAN did beat JMM but not in the same fashion as Joe did

 

Calzaghe beat Hopkins in a close fight, correct decision IMO.

Marquez beat Pacquiao on my card, I gave JMM 9 rds so its not even close.

 

NEITHER

lol @ this **** thread

 

Since the thread starter is a *** & never did a public poll, you 6 lying *******s that voted for Calzaghe-Hopkins are gonna have to own up to it, who are you ?

 

:good

 

A typical Pac fan amateur response, I suppose you are also one of those ****s that think Pac won because JMM had more marks on his face, right ? :rofl

 

:deal :good